Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Nam-Joon Yi"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Nam-Joon Yi"

Original Articles

Hepatic neoplasm

Exploring methylation signatures for high de novo recurrence risk in hepatocellular carcinoma
Da-Won Kim, Jin Hyun Park, Suk Kyun Hong, Min-Hyeok Jung, Ji-One Pyeon, Jin-Young Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh, Nam-Joon Yi, YoungRok Choi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Young-Joon Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31(2):563-576.
Published online January 13, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0899
Background/Aims
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits high de novo recurrence rates post-resection. Current post-surgery recurrence prediction methods are limited, emphasizing the need for reliable biomarkers to assess recurrence risk. We aimed to develop methylation-based markers for classifying HCC patients and predicting their risk of de novo recurrence post-surgery.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from HCC patients who underwent surgical resection in Korea, excluding those with recurrence within one year post-surgery. Using the Infinium Methylation EPIC array on 140 samples in the discovery cohort, we classified patients into low- and high-risk groups based on methylation profiles. Distinctive markers were identified through random forest analysis. These markers were validated in the cancer genome atlas (n=217), Validation cohort 1 (n=63) and experimental Validation using a methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) assay in Validation cohort 1 and Validation cohort 2 (n=63).
Results
The low-risk recurrence group (methylation group 1; MG1) showed a methylation average of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.77) with a 23.5% recurrence rate, while the high-risk group (MG2) had an average of 0.17 (95% CI 0.14–0.20) with a 44.1% recurrence rate (P<0.03). Validation confirmed the applicability of methylation markers across diverse populations, showing high accuracy in predicting the probability of HCC recurrence risk (area under the curve 96.8%). The MS-HRM assay confirmed its effectiveness in predicting de novo recurrence with 95.5% sensitivity, 89.7% specificity, and 92.2% accuracy.
Conclusions
Methylation markers effectively classified HCC patients by de novo recurrence risk, enhancing prediction accuracy and potentially offering personalized management strategies.
  • 8,045 View
  • 142 Download
  • 3 Web of Science

Liver Transplantation

Immunosuppression status of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C affects biopsy-proven acute rejection
Jong Man Kim, Kwang-Woong Lee, Gi-Won Song, Bo-Hyun Jung, Hae Won Lee, Nam-Joon Yi, ChoonHyuck David Kwon, Shin Hwang, Kyung-Suk Suh, Jae-Won Joh, Suk-Koo Lee, Sung-Gyu Lee
Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22(3):366-371.
Published online September 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0022
Background/Aims
The relationship between patient survival and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C remains unclear. The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of patients with and without BPAR and to identify risk factors for BPAR.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 169 HCV-RNA-positive patients who underwent LT at three centers.
Results
BPAR occurred in 39 (23.1%) of the HCV-RNA-positive recipients after LT. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 92.1%, 90.3%, and 88.5%, respectively, in patients without BPAR, and 75.7%, 63.4%, and 58.9% in patients with BPAR (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that BPAR was associated with the non-use of basiliximab and tacrolimus and the use of cyclosporin in LT recipients with HCV RNA-positive.
Conclusions
The results of the present study suggest that the immunosuppression status of HCV-RNA-positive LT recipients should be carefully determined in order to prevent BPAR and to improve patient survival.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Early use of everolimus improved renal function after adult deceased donor liver transplantation
    Seohee Lee, Jong Man Kim, Sangjin Kim, Jinsoo Rhu, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jae-Won Joh
    Korean Journal of Transplantation.2021; 35(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • 13,831 View
  • 148 Download
  • Crossref

Liver Transplantation

Safety of reduced dose of mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation
Hyeyoung Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Juyeun Lee, Joohyun Kim, Mi-Ra Moon, Jaehong Jeong, Jeong-Moo Lee, Tae Suk You, Suk-Won Suh, Min-Su Park, YoungRok Choi, Geun Hong, Hae Won Lee, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(3):291-299.
Published online September 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.291
Background/Aims

The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reduced in Asia due to side effects associated with the conventional fixed dose of 2-3 g/day. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of a reduced dose of MMF and to validate its feasibility in combination with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Two sequential studies were performed in adult LDLT between October 2009 and 2011. First, we performed a prospective pharmacokinetic study in 15 recipients. We measured the area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) for mycophenolic acid at postoperative days 7 and 14, and we performed a protocol biopsy before discharge. Second, among 215 recipients, we reviewed 74 patients who were initially administered a reduced dose of MMF (1.0 g/day) with tacrolimus (trough, 8-12 ng/mL during the first month, and 5-8 ng/mL thereafter), with a 1-year follow-up. We performed protocol biopsies at 2 weeks and 1 year post-LDLT.

Results

In the first part of study, AUC0-12 was less than 30 mgh/L in 93.3% of cases. In the second, validating study, 41.9% of the recipients needed dose reduction or cessation due to side effects within the first year after LDLT. At 12 months post-LDLT, 17.6% of the recipients were administered a lower dose of MMF (0.5 g/day), and 16.2% needed permanent cessation due to side effects. The 1- and 12-month rejection-free survival rates were 98.6% and 97.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

A reduced dose of MMF was associated with low blood levels compared to the existing recommended therapeutic range. However, reducing the dose of MMF combined with a low level of tacrolimus was feasible clinically, with an excellent short-term outcome in LDLT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Large-Scale Real-World Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Liver Transplantation: Impact of Bayesian Dose Adjustment
    Marc Labriffe, Hamza Sayadi, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Ludovic Micallef, Franck Saint-Marcoux, Alexandre Destere, Pierre Marquet, Caroline Monchaud
    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus and Corticosteroids in Combination With or Without Mycophenolate Mofetil in Liver Transplantation Recipients Infected With Hepatitis B Virus
    Jeong-Ik Park, Gi-Won Song, Je Ho Ryu, Sang-Tae Choi, Nam-Gyu Choi, Bo-Hyun Jung, Chong Woo Chu, Keon-Kuk Kim, Dong-Hwan Jung, Tae-Yong Ha, Deok-Bog Moon, Kwangho Yang, Min-Ho Shin, Yong-Kyu Chung, Shin Hwang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee
    Transplantation Proceedings.2023; 55(2): 387.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of a Weight-Based Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing Protocol for Kidney Transplant Maintenance Immunosuppression
    Melanie Tess Mahoney, Elisabeth Lapp Kincaide, Joelle Nelson, Kelsey Anne Klein, Reed Charles Hall, Suverta Bhayana
    Journal of Clinical Nephrology.2023; 7(2): 047.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conversion from the tacrolimus capsule to tablet in stable liver transplant recipients with maintenance therapy: a 24-week, open-label, single-center, phase IV exploratory clinical study
    Jae-Yoon Kim, Sukyoung Chang, Jiyoung Kim, Hyun Hwa Choi, Jaewon Lee, Su young Hong, Jeong-Moo Lee, Suk Kyun Hong, YoungRok Choi, Nam-Joon Yi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(4): 228.     CrossRef
  • Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology
    Stein Bergan, Mercè Brunet, Dennis A. Hesselink, Kamisha L. Johnson-Davis, Paweł K. Kunicki, Florian Lemaitre, Pierre Marquet, Mariadelfina Molinaro, Ofelia Noceti, Smita Pattanaik, Tomasz Pawinski, Christoph Seger, Maria Shipkova, Jesse J. Swen, Teun van
    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.2021; 43(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Asian Liver Transplant Network Clinical Guidelines on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation
    Poh Seng Tan, Mark D. Muthiah, Tsingyi Koh, Yee Leong Teoh, Albert Chan, Alfred Kow, Qishi Zheng, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Guan Huei Lee, Cosmas Rinaldi A. Lesmana, Vanessa de Villa, James Fung, Kieron Lim
    Transplantation.2019; 103(3): 470.     CrossRef
  • Early Onset Polymorphic Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease Mimicking a Solitary Necrotizing Abscess in a Graft Liver
    Pil Soo Sung, Jaejun Lee, Joon Lee, Hee Chul Nam, Si Hyun Bae, Seung Kew Yoon
    Journal of Liver Cancer.2019; 19(2): 165.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Generic Mycophenolate Mofetil (My-rept) 500-Milligram Tablets in Primary Liver Transplant Recipients
    S.K. Hong, K.-W. Lee, K.C. Yoon, H.-S. Kim, H. Kim, N.-J. Yi, K.-S. Suh
    Transplantation Proceedings.2017; 49(6): 1402.     CrossRef
  • Types and Structure of Complications, and Causes of Mortality with Different Combinations of Immunosuppressants in Patients of Undergoing Organ Transplantation
    Zhamalbek Ashimov, Zhanybek Gaibyldaev
    Heart, Vessels and Transplantation.2017; 1(Issue 2): 61.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for the Adverse Events after Conversion from Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplantation Patients
    Suk-Won Suh, Kwang-Woong Lee, Jaehong Jeong, Hyeyoung Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Kyung-Suk Suh
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2016; 31(11): 1711.     CrossRef
  • Mycophenolate-mofetil

    Reactions Weekly.2015; 1566(1): 164.     CrossRef
  • 14,736 View
  • 105 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Impact of immunosuppressant therapy on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation
Ju-Yeun Lee, Yul Hee Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Hyang Sook Kim, Hye Suk Lee, Byung Koo Lee, Hyeyoung Kim, Young Rok Choi, Geun Hong, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(2):192-203.
Published online June 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.2.192
Background/Aims

The most commonly used immunosuppressant therapy after liver transplantation (LT) is a combination of tacrolimus and steroid. Basiliximab induction has recently been introduced; however, the most appropriate immunosuppression for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after LT is still debated.

Methods

Ninety-three LT recipients with HCC who took tacrolimus and steroids as major immunosuppressants were included. Induction with basiliximab was implemented in 43 patients (46.2%). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to reduce the tacrolimus dosage (n=28, 30.1%). The 1-year tacrolimus exposure level was 7.2 ± 1.3 ng/mL (mean ± SD).

Results

The 1- and 3-year recurrence rates of HCC were 12.9% and 19.4%, respectively. Tacrolimus exposure, cumulative steroid dosages, and MMF dosages had no impact on HCC recurrence. Induction therapy with basiliximab, high alpha fetoprotein (AFP; >400 ng/mL) and protein induced by vitamin K absence/antagonist-II (PIVKA-II; >100 mAU/mL) levels, and microvascular invasion were significant risk factors for 1-year recurrence (P<0.05). High AFP and PIVKA-II levels, and positive 18fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography findings were significantly associated with 3-year recurrence (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Induction therapy with basiliximab, a strong immunosuppressant, may have a negative impact with respect to early HCC recurrence (i.e., within 1 year) in high-risk patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Assessing cumulative exposure to maintenance immunosuppressive drugs: Metrics, outcomes, and implications for transplant patients
    Cavizshajan Skanthan, Emily Nguyen, Lakindu Somaweera, Madhumitha Rabindranath, Ani Orchanian-Cheff, Alexandra Viau-Trudel, Myriam Khalili, Olusegun Famure, S. Joseph Kim
    Transplantation Reviews.2025; 39(2): 100914.     CrossRef
  • Immunological Crossroads: Optimizing Antirejection Regimens to Sustain Antitumor Immunity in Liver Transplant Recipients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chao Zhang, Xin Yuan, Kunlin Xie
    Cancers.2025; 17(23): 3871.     CrossRef
  • Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for a Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Genetically Identical Twin Sister
    Ger Koek, Sophia M. Schmitz, Jan Bednarsch, Daniel Heise, Thomas Longerich, Frank Bakers, Christian Trautwein, Tom Luedde, Tom Florian Ulmer, Ulf Peter Neumann
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(01): 56.     CrossRef
  • Validation of Japanese indication criteria for deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of US national registry data
    Yuki Bekki, Shinji Itoh, Takeo Toshima, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
    Hepatology Research.2024; 54(7): 695.     CrossRef
  • Research progress of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zheyu Zhou, Qiaoyu Liu, Jinsong Liu, Wenwen Li, Shuya Cao, Jiawei Xu, Jun Chen, Xiaoliang Xu, Chaobo Chen
    Heliyon.2024; 10(9): e30622.     CrossRef
  • Immunosuppression in liver transplant oncology: position paper of the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT)
    Umberto Cillo, Amedeo Carraro, Alfonso W. Avolio, Matteo Cescon, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Valerio Giannelli, Paolo Magistri, Daniele Nicolini, Marco Vivarelli, Jacopo Lanari, Salvatore Agnes, Enzo Andorno, Umberto Baccarani, Lucio Caccamo, Michele Colledan,
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(3): 725.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing bloodstream infections after immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia: a logistic regression analysis
    Jing Li
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(10): 5667.     CrossRef
  • Comments on: Induction Immunosuppression Does Not Worsen Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Jan Lerut, Quirino Lai
    Transplantation.2023; 107(7): 1434.     CrossRef
  • Induction Immunosuppression Does Not Worsen Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Claire Durkin, Douglas E. Schaubel, Yuwen Xu, Nadim Mahmud, David E. Kaplan, Peter L. Abt, Therese Bittermann
    Transplantation.2023; 107(7): 1524.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation
    Federica Rigo, Nicola De Stefano, Damiano Patrono, Victor De Donato, Ludovico Campi, Diana Turturica, Teresa Doria, Veronica Sciannameo, Paola Berchialla, Francesco Tandoi, Renato Romagnoli
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(5): 703.     CrossRef
  • Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Who Have Undergo Liver Transplantation: A Case Control Study
    Sami Akbulut, Murat Tamer, Serdar Saritas, Ozlem Unal, Musap Akyuz, Selver Unsal, Zeynep Kucukakcali, Ertugrul Karabulut, Sertac Usta, Sezai Yilmaz
    Transplantation Proceedings.2023; 55(5): 1231.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic biomarkers in and selection of surgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hans‐Christian Pommergaard
    APMIS.2023; 131(S146): 1.     CrossRef
  • Reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure with antibody induction and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation
    Jenny Abrahamsson, Malin Sternby Eilard, Magnus Rizell, William Bennett, Fredrik Åberg
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 57(3): 325.     CrossRef
  • State of the art treatment of hepatitis B virus hepatocellular carcinoma and the role of hepatitis B surface antigen post‐liver transplantation and resection
    Peter Schemmer, Patrizia Burra, Rey‐Heng Hu, Christian M. Hüber, Carmelo Loinaz, Keigo Machida, Arndt Vogel, Didier Samuel
    Liver International.2022; 42(2): 288.     CrossRef
  • Anticancer Effect of Statins in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Hae Lim Lee, Sung Won Lee, Jeong Won Jang, Si Hyun Bae, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Ho Joong Choi, Gun Hyung Na, Young Kyoung You, Il Young Park, Dong Goo Kim
    Liver Transplantation.2022; 28(3): 397.     CrossRef
  • ABO-Incompatible Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the Era of Rituximab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dipesh Kumar Yadav, Yong Fei Hua, Xueli Bai, Jianying Lou, Risheng Que, Shunling Gao, Yun Zhang, Ji Wang, Qinfen Xie, Muhammad Ibrahim Alhadi Edoo, Vikram Kumar Chutturghoon, Tingbo Liang
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Mini-review. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    V. Visag-Castillo
    Revista Médica del Hospital General de México.2018; 81(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Sorafenib for the Treatment of Post-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence
    Seong Hee Kang, Hyeki Cho, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Yoon Jun Kim, Nam-Joon Yi, Kwang-Woong Lee, Kyung-Suk Suh, Jung-Hwan Yoon
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Basiliximab application on liver recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guo-Qing Zhang, Cheng-Shuo Zhang, Ning Sun, Wu Lv, Bao-Min Chen, Jia-Lin Zhang
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2017; 16(2): 139.     CrossRef
  • Serologic and molecular biomarkers for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jakob Burcharth, Jacob Rosenberg, Allan Rasmussen
    Transplantation Reviews.2016; 30(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Entwicklungen der Immunmodulation nach Transplantation im Hinblick auf De-novo-Malignome und Tumorrezidive
    J. Mittler, H. Lang
    Der Onkologe.2016; 22(7): 461.     CrossRef
  • Cause and effect: the etiology of pediatric hepatocellular carcinoma and the role for liver transplantation
    Allison F. O'Neill, Douglas W. Hanto, Howard M. Katzenstein
    Pediatric Transplantation.2016; 20(7): 878.     CrossRef
  • Immunosuppression Strategies in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
    C. San Miguel, Y. Fundora, J. Triguero, K. Muffak, T. Villegas, A. Becerra, D. Garrote, J.A. Ferrón
    Transplantation Proceedings.2015; 47(8): 2371.     CrossRef
  • A Retrospective Study to Compare the use of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Combination with Adriamycin in Post-Transplant Liver Cancer Patients
    Liangfeng Gu, Wei Jin, Liandi Kan, Xia Wang, Chunlei Shan, Hui Fan
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.2015; 71(2): 565.     CrossRef
  • Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - factors influencing outcome and disease-free survival
    René Fahrner
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(42): 12071.     CrossRef
  • Review on immunosuppression in liver transplantation
    Maryam Moini
    World Journal of Hepatology.2015; 7(10): 1355.     CrossRef
  • Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Alkaline Phosphatase as Very Early Predictors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation
    Katja Piras-Straub, Khaleda Khairzada, Guido Gerken, Fuat Saner, Jürgen Treckmann, Andreas Paul, Ali Canbay, Kerstin Herzer
    Digestion.2015; 91(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • 14,309 View
  • 104 Download
  • 29 Web of Science
  • Crossref