Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Clin Mol Hepatol : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

2
results for

"Seung Hwan Cha"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Seung Hwan Cha"

Original Articles

Hepatic neoplasm

The usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma viability after transarterial chemoembolization: pilot study
Youn Zoo Cho, So Yeon Park, Eun Hee Choi, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Young Ju Kim, Seung Hwan Cha, Moon Young Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2015;21(2):165-174.
Published online June 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2015.21.2.165
Background/Aims

The therapeutic effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually assessed using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). However, dense lipiodol depositions can mask the enhancement of viable HCC tissue in MDCT. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) could be effective in detecting small areas of viability and patency in vessels. We investigated whether arterial enhancement in CEUS after treatment with TACE can be used to detect HCC viability earlier than when using MDCT.

Methods

Twelve patients received CEUS, MDCT, and gadoxetic-acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 4 and 12 weeks after TACE. The definition of viable HCC was defined as MRI positivity after 4 or 12 weeks.

Results

Eight of the 12 patients showed MRI positivity at 4 or 12 weeks. All patients with positive CEUS findings at 4 weeks (n=8) showed MRI positivity and residual viable HCC at 4 or 12 weeks. Five of the eight patients with positive CEUS findings at 4 weeks had negative results on the 4-week MDCT scan. Four (50%) of these eight patients did not have MRI positivity at 4 weeks and were ultimately confirmed as having residual HCC tissue at the 12-week MRI. Kappa statistics revealed near-perfect agreement between CEUS and MRI (κ=1.00) and substantial agreement between MDCT and MRI (κ=0.67).

Conclusions

In the assessment of the response to TACE, CEUS at 4 weeks showed excellent results for detecting residual viable HCC, which suggests that CEUS can be used as an early additive diagnosis tool when deciding early additional treatment with TACE.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Diagnostic values of contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating the response of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolisation: a meta-analysis
    Chao Zhang, Xin Chen, Jukun Wang, Tao Luo
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(4): e070364.     CrossRef
  • Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Transcatheter Arterial Embolization
    Kathryn L. McGillen, William Watkins Pryor, Nelson S. Yee, Junjia Zhu, Karen L. Krok, Peter N. Waybill
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(24): 7720.     CrossRef
  • The feasibility of early response evaluation using superb microvascular imaging one day after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Soeui Oh, Heejin Kwon, Kyungjae Lim, Jinhan Cho, Eunju Kang, Sanghyun Kim, Yanghyun Baek
    Journal of Clinical Ultrasound.2023; 51(5): 866.     CrossRef
  • Contrast-enhanced US Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Chemoembolization: A Prospective Multicenter Trial
    Esika Savsani, Colette M. Shaw, Flemming Forsberg, Corinne E. Wessner, Andrej Lyshchik, Patrick O'Kane, Ji-Bin Liu, Rashmi Balasubramanya, Christopher G. Roth, Haresh Naringrekar, Scott W. Keith, Allison Tan, Kevin Anton, Kristen Bradigan, Jesse Civan, Su
    Radiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, enhancement CT and MRI for diagnosing of liver lesions
    Gang Zhang, Dandan Liu
    Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation.2022; 80(3): 241.     CrossRef
  • Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Agostino Inzerillo, Maria Franca Meloni, Adele Taibbi, Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta
    World Journal of Hepatology.2022; 14(5): 911.     CrossRef
  • Intraarterial contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict the short-term tumour response of hepatocellular carcinoma to Transarterial chemoembolization with Lipiodol
    Jiang Bo, Han Peng, Zhu LianHua, Fei Xiang, Luo YuKun
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early evaluation of treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The role of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Jiaying Cao, Yi Dong, Peili Fan, Feng Mao, Kailing Chen, Rongxin Chen, Beijian Huang, Yaqing Cheng, Wen-Ping Wang
    Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation.2021; 78(4): 365.     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yang Hai, Esika Savsani, Weelic Chong, John Eisenbrey, Andrej Lyshchik
    Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(11): 5162.     CrossRef
  • Utility of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound for Early Therapeutic Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
    Yukinobu Watanabe, Masahiro Ogawa, Mariko Kumagawa, Midori Hirayama, Takao Miura, Naoki Matsumoto, Hiroshi Nakagawara, Toshiki Yamamoto, Mitsuhiko Moriyama
    Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2020; 39(3): 431.     CrossRef
  • Contrast-enhanced US for the Interventional Radiologist: Current and Emerging Applications
    Christopher D. Malone, David T. Fetzer, Wayne L. Monsky, Malak Itani, Vincent M. Mellnick, Philip A. Velez, William D. Middleton, Michalakis A. Averkiou, Raja S. Ramaswamy
    RadioGraphics.2020; 40(2): 562.     CrossRef
  • Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasonography Versus Contrast‐Enhanced Computed Tomography for Assessment of Residual Tumor From Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Meta‐analysis
    Junlin Zhong, Zhongzhen Su, Yanling Zhang, Hui Zhang, Peijie Lin, Xixiang Tang, Rongqin Zheng
    Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2018; 37(8): 1881.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma transarterial chemoembolization using quantitative analysis of 2D and 3D real-time contrast enhanced ultrasound
    Kibo Nam, Maria Stanczak, Andrej Lyshchik, Priscilla Machado, Yuko Kono, Flemming Forsberg, Colette M Shaw, John R Eisenbrey
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2018; 4(3): 035039.     CrossRef
  • Bench-To-Clinic Development of Imageable Drug-Eluting Embolization Beads: Finding the Balance
    Andrew L Lewis, Sean L Willis, Matthew R Dreher, Yiqing Tang, Koorosh Ashrafi, Bradford J Wood, Elliot B Levy, Karun V Sharma, Ayele H Negussie, Andrew S Mikhail
    Future Oncology.2018; 14(26): 2741.     CrossRef
  • Acetylated Polyethylenimine-Entrapped Gold Nanoparticles Enable Negative Computed Tomography Imaging of Orthotopic Hepatic Carcinoma
    Benqing Zhou, Zhijuan Xiong, Peng Wang, Chen Peng, Mingwu Shen, Xiangyang Shi
    Langmuir.2018; 34(29): 8701.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of tumor response to intra-arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with multiphase computed tomography
    S.B. Paul, E. Dhamija, S.R. Gamanagatti, V. Sreenivas, D.P. Yadav, S. Jain, Shalimar, S.K. Acharya
    Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging.2017; 98(3): 253.     CrossRef
  • Hepatic imaging following intra-arterial embolotherapy
    Joseph Ralph Kallini, Frank H. Miller, Ahmed Gabr, Riad Salem, Robert J. Lewandowski
    Abdominal Radiology.2016; 41(4): 600.     CrossRef
  • Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Diagnosis and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Trends
    Christopher D. Malone, Robert F. Mattrey, David T. Fetzer
    Current Hepatology Reports.2016; 15(4): 307.     CrossRef
  • 14,019 View
  • 100 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension

Effects of candesartan and propranolol combination therapy versus propranolol monotherapy in reducing portal hypertension
Jae Hyun Kim, Jung Min Kim, Youn Zoo Cho, Ji Hoon Na, Hyun Sik Kim, Hyoun A Kim, Hye Won Kang, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Seung Hwan Cha, Young Ju Kim, Moon Young Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(4):376-383.
Published online December 24, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.4.376
Background/Aims

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit activated hepatic stellate cell contraction and are thought to reduce the dynamic portion of intrahepatic resistance. This study compared the effects of combined treatment using the ARB candesartan and propranolol versus propranolol monotherapy on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Between January 2008 and July 2009, 53 cirrhotic patients with clinically significant portal hypertension were randomized to receive either candesartan and propranolol combination therapy (26 patients) or propranolol monotherapy (27 patients). Before and 3 months after the administration of the planned medication, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was assessed in both groups. The dose of propranolol was subsequently increased from 20 mg bid until the target heart rate was reached, and the candesartan dose was fixed at 8 mg qd. The primary endpoint was the HVPG response rate; patients with an HVPG reduction of >20% of the baseline value or to <12 mmHg were defined as responders.

Results

The mean portal pressure declined significantly in both groups, from 16 mmHg (range, 12-28 mmHg) to 13.5 mmHg (range, 6-20 mmHg) in the combination group (P<0.05), and from 17 mmHg (range, 12-27 mmHg) to 14 mmHg (range, 7-25 mmHg) in the propranolol monotherapy group (P<0.05). However, the medication-induced pressure reduction did not differ significantly between the two groups [3.5 mmHg (range, -3-11 mmHg) vs. 3 mmHg (range, -8-10 mmHg), P=0.674]. The response rate (55.6% vs. 61.5%, P=0.435) and the reductions in mean blood pressure or heart rate also did not differ significantly between the combination and monotherapy groups.

Conclusions

The addition of candesartan (an ARB) to propranolol confers no benefit relative to classical propranolol monotherapy for the treatment of portal hypertension, and is thus not recommended.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • From Pathophysiology to Practice: Evolving Pharmacological Therapies, Clinical Complications, and Pharmacogenetic Considerations in Portal Hypertension
    Michał Porada, Łukasz Bułdak
    Metabolites.2025; 15(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future Directions in the Pharmacologic Management of Cirrhosis
    Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul, K. Rajender Reddy
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2025; 29(4): 657.     CrossRef
  • The Renin–Angiotensin System in Liver Disease
    Mary S. McGrath, Brian J. Wentworth
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(11): 5807.     CrossRef
  • Autoregulation: mediators and renin–angiotensin system in diseases and treatments
    Antony Sameh Mansour
    Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The longitudinal outcomes of applying non-selective beta-blockers in portal hypertension: real-world multicenter study
    Seong Hee Kang, Minjong Lee, Moon Young Kim, Jun Hyeok Lee, Baek Gyu Jun, Tae Suk Kim, Dae Hee Choi, Ki Tae Suk, Young Don Kim, Gab Jin Cheon, Dong Joon Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2021; 15(2): 424.     CrossRef
  • Pathways of hepatic and renal damage through non‐classical activation of the renin‐angiotensin system in chronic liver disease
    Giovanni Sansoè, Manuela Aragno, Florence Wong
    Liver International.2020; 40(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Portal Hypertension and Related Complications: Diagnosis and Management
    Douglas A. Simonetto, Mengfei Liu, Patrick S. Kamath
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings.2019; 94(4): 714.     CrossRef
  • Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Disease: An Update on Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities
    Paul Manka, Amos Zeller, Wing-Kin Syn
    Drugs.2019; 79(9): 903.     CrossRef
  • Pharmacologic Management of Portal Hypertension
    Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul, K. Rajender Reddy
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2019; 23(4): 713.     CrossRef
  • Novelties in the pathophysiology and management of portal hypertension: new treatments on the horizon
    Seong Hee Kang, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2018; 12(S1): 112.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huijing Yao, Chunqing Zhang
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2018; 187(4): 925.     CrossRef
  • Role of the renin-angiotensin system in hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension
    Kwang Yong Shim, Young Woo Eom, Moon Young Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Soon Koo Baik
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2018; 33(3): 453.     CrossRef
  • Impact of sarcopenia on prognostic value of cirrhosis: going beyond the hepatic venous pressure gradient and MELD score
    Seong Hee Kang, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Soon Koo Baik, Seung Hwan Cha, Moon Young Kim
    Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.2018; 9(5): 860.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Hepatic Vein Arrival Time Performed with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaeun Kim, Kwang Yong Shim, Soon Koo Baik
    Gut and Liver.2017; 11(1): 93.     CrossRef
  • Decreased potency of fimasartan in liver cirrhosis was quantified using mixed-effects analysis
    Choon OK Kim, Sangil Jeon, Seunghoon Han, Taegon Hong, Min Soo Park, Young-Ran Yoon, Dong-Seok Yim
    Translational and Clinical Pharmacology.2017; 25(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Novel treatment options for portal hypertension
    Philipp Schwabl, Wim Laleman
    Gastroenterology Report.2017; 5(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Rifaximin and Propranolol Combination Therapy Is More Effective than Propranolol Monotherapy for the Reduction of Portal Pressure: An Open Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Yoo Li Lim, Moon Young Kim, Yoon Ok Jang, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon
    Gut and Liver.2017; 11(5): 702.     CrossRef
  • Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a systematic review
    Gaeun Kim, Juyoung Kim, Yoo Li Lim, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2016; 10(5): 819.     CrossRef
  • Emerging therapies for portal hypertension in cirrhosis
    Harikumar Nair, Annalisa Berzigotti, Jaime Bosch
    Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs.2016; 21(2): 167.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin receptor blocker add-on therapy in portal hypertension: To use angiotensin receptor blocker or not to use, that is the question
    Hyun Woong Lee
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2014; 20(4): 345.     CrossRef
  • 13,384 View
  • 84 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • Crossref