Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

25
results for

"Adefovir"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Adefovir"

Original Article

Viral hepatitis

Entecavir+tenofovir vs. lamivudine/telbivudine+adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response
Hyun Young Woo, Jun Yong Park, Si Hyun Bae, Chang Wook Kim, Jae Young Jang, Won Young Tak, Dong Joon Kim, In Hee Kim, Jeong Heo, Sang Hoon Ahn
Clin Mol Hepatol 2020;26(3):352-363.
Published online May 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2019.0044n
Background/Aims
Suboptimal responses to lamivudine or telbivudine plus adefovir (LAM/LdT+ADV) rescue therapy are common in patients with LAM-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections. We compared patients switched to entecavir plus tenofovir (ETV+TDF) to those maintained on LAM/LdT+ADV.
Methods
This prospective randomized controlled trial examined 91 patients whose serum HBV DNA levels were greater than 60 IU/mL after at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM/LdT+ADV for LAM-resistant HBV. Patients were randomized to receive a new treatment (ETV+TDF, n=45) or maintained on the same treatment (LAM/LdT+ADV, n=46) for 48 weeks. Patients with baseline ADV resistance were excluded.
Result
s: Compared to LAM/LdT+ADV group, ETV+TDF group had more patients with a virologic response (42/45 [93.33%] vs. 3/46 [6.52%], P<0.001) and had a greater mean reduction in serum HBV DNA level from baseline (-4.16 vs. -0.37 log10 IU/mL, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that high baseline HBV DNA level (P=0.005) and LAM/LdT+ADV maintenance therapy (P=0.001) were negatively associated with virologic response. At week 48, additional ADV- or ETV-associated mutations were cleared in ETV+TDF group, but such mutations were present in 4.3% of patients in LAM/LdT+ADV group (P=0.106). The two groups had similar rates of adverse events.
Conclusions
ETV+TDF combination treatment led to a significantly higher rate of virologic response compared to LAM/LdT+ADV combination treatment in patients with LAM-resistant HBV who had suboptimal responses to LAM/LdT+ADV regardless of HBV genotypic resistance profile (NCT01597934).

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Research Status of Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B
    漫 赵
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(04): 1194.     CrossRef
  • Viral oncogenesis in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutics
    Qing Xiao, Yi Liu, Tingting Li, Chaoyu Wang, Sanxiu He, Liuyue Zhai, Zailin Yang, Xiaomei Zhang, Yongzhong Wu, Yao Liu
    Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus Drug Resistance Mutations to Lamivudine among People with HIV/HBV Coinfection in Rural and Peri-Urban Communities in Botswana
    Bonolo B. Phinius, Motswedi Anderson, Irene Gobe, Margaret Mokomane, Wonderful T. Choga, Basetsana Phakedi, Tsholofelo Ratsoma, Gorata Mpebe, Joseph Makhema, Roger Shapiro, Shahin Lockman, Rosemary Musonda, Sikhulile Moyo, Simani Gaseitsiwe
    Viruses.2024; 16(4): 592.     CrossRef
  • Real-world study on the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens in treatment-naïve CHB patients with high viral load
    Xue Wu, Qin Yan, Chunmei Jiang, Rongshan Fan, Sheling Li
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Target-centric analysis of hepatitis B: identifying key molecules and pathways for treatment
    Xinyu Song, Jinlu Zhu, Fengzhi Sun, Nonghan Wang, Xiao Qiu, Qingjun Zhu, Jianhong Qi, Xiaolong Wang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the impact of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral interventions to reduce vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus
    Dhita Prabasari Wibowo, Agustiningsih Agustiningsih, Sri Jayanti, Caecilia H C Sukowati, Korri Elvanita El Khobar
    World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenomide for the Treatment of HIV/Hepatitis B Virus Co-infection in Patients with Cancer and Transplant Recipients
    Jana K Dickter, Justine A Ross
    Infectious Diseases.2023; 2(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Old age as a risk factor for liver diseases: Modern therapeutic approaches
    Milena Georgieva, Charilaos Xenodochidis, Natalia Krasteva
    Experimental Gerontology.2023; 184: 112334.     CrossRef
  • Study on the intestinal permeability of lamivudine using Caco-2 cells monolayer and Single-pass intestinal perfusion
    Weiyin Huang, Shuang Chen, Lin Sun, Hubin Wwang, Hongqun Qiao
    Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2022; 29(4): 2247.     CrossRef
  • External Validation of the FSAC Model Using On-Therapy Changes in Noninvasive Fibrosis Markers in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicenter Study
    Jae Seung Lee, Hyun Woong Lee, Tae Seop Lim, In Kyung Min, Hye Won Lee, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Beom Kyung Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(3): 711.     CrossRef
  • 8,905 View
  • 206 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Case Report

Viral hepatitis

Adefovir-induced Fanconi syndrome associated with osteomalacia
Samel Park, Woo-Il Kim, Dai-Hyun Cho, Yeo-Joo Kim, Hong-Soo Kim, Ji-Hee Kim, Seung-Kuy Cha, Kyu-Sang Park, Ji-Hye Lee, Sang Mi Lee, Eun Young Lee
Clin Mol Hepatol 2018;24(3):339-344.
Published online September 1, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2017.0009
Fanconi syndrome is a dysfunction of the proximal renal tubules that results in impaired reabsorption and increased urinary loss of phosphate and other solutes. The pathophysiology of drug-induced Fanconi syndrome is unclear. Here we report the case of a 36-year-old woman who presented with pain in multiple bones and proteinuria. She had a 7-year history of taking adefovir at 10 mg/day for chronic hepatitis B. Three years previously she had received surgery for a nontraumatic right femur neck fracture, after which she continued to complain of pain in multiple bones, and proteinuria, glycosuria, and phosphaturia were noted. The findings of a light-microscope examination of a renal biopsy sample were normal, but mitochondrial damage of the proximal tubules was evident in electron microscopy. Western blot analysis revealed that the level of serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) was lower than in normal controls. After 2 months of treatment, hypophosphatemia and proximal tubular dysfunction were reversed, and serum FGF23 had normalized. This case suggests that direct mitochondrial damage in proximal tubules can cause drug-induced Fanconi syndrome associated with osteomalacia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Phosphonates and Phosphonate Prodrugs in Medicinal Chemistry: Past Successes and Future Prospects
    Marcela Krečmerová, Pavel Majer, Rana Rais, Barbara S. Slusher
    Frontiers in Chemistry.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The genetic polymorphisms of XPR1 and SCL34A3 are associated with Fanconi syndrome in Chinese patients of tumor-induced osteomalacia
    Y. Jiang, X. Li, J. Feng, M. Li, O. Wang, X.-P. Xing, W.-B. Xia
    Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.2021; 44(4): 773.     CrossRef
  • Osteomalacia and renal failure due to Fanconi syndrome caused by long-term low-dose Adefovir Dipivoxil: a case report
    Qian Xiang, Zhiyan Liu, Yanyan Yu, Hanxu Zhang, Qiufen Xie, Guangyan Mu, Jianhua Zhang, Xinan Cen, Yimin Cui
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fanconi syndrome induced by adefovir dipivoxil: a case report and clinical review
    Kaixin Song, Qi Yan, Yi Yang, Mengyue Lv, Yuting Chen, Yue Dai, Le Zhang, Yi Huang, Cuntai Zhang, Hongyu Gao
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia Associated with Adefovir-induced Fanconi Syndrome Initially Diagnosed as Diabetic Kidney Disease and Vitamin D Deficiency
    Ryo Koda, Masafumi Tsuchida, Noriaki Iino, Ichiei Narita
    Internal Medicine.2019; 58(6): 821.     CrossRef
  • KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2019; 25(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir

    Reactions Weekly.2019; 1761(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • 21,516 View
  • 348 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Original Article

Viral hepatitis

Tenofovir has inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients compared to nucleos(t)ide-naïve patients
Goh Eun Chung, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jeong-ju Yoo, Minjong Lee, Yuri Cho, Dong Hyeon Lee, Hwi Young Kim, Su Jong Yu, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Fabien Zoulim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2017;23(1):66-73.
Published online February 14, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0060
Background/Aims
A recent study reported that entecavir had inferior efficacy in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients compared to NA-naïve patients. We sought to compare the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in NA-experienced and NA-naïve CHB patients.
Methods
We retrospectively enrolled 252 consecutive patients who had a serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level greater than 2,000 IU/mL at the initiation of TDF treatment and who received TDF for at least 6 months. Complete virologic suppression (CVS) was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA. We generated a multivariate Cox proportional-hazard model to examine predictive factors that were independently associated with time to CVS.
Result
s: The mean age of patients was 48.2 years, and the cohort included 181 NA-naïve patients and 71 NA-experienced patients. The median duration of TDF treatment was 14.4 (interquartile range, 9.5-17.8) months. A total of 167 (92.3%) of 181 NA-naïve patients achieved CVS, and 60 (84.5%) of 71 NA-exposed patients achieved CVS. Forty-nine (89.1%) of 55 patients who previously took an NA aside from adefovir and 11 (68.8%) of 16 adefovir-experienced patients achieved CVS. In multivariable analysis, previous adefovir exposure significantly influenced time to CVS (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.72; P=0.003), after adjusting for HBeAg positivity, baseline HBV DNA level and cirrhosis.
Conclusions
Tenofovir had inferior efficacy in adefovir-experienced CHB patients compared to NA-naïve patients. The response of patients with previous adefovir exposure to TDF monotherapy should be monitored closely.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for multiple nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment failure hepatitis B: Is monotherapy enough?
    Xieer Liang, Qing Xie, Jia Shang, Hong Tang, Min Xu, Qinghua Meng, Jiming Zhang, Pujun Gao, Jifang Sheng, Hao Wang, Jidong Jia, Guiqiang Wang, Shunquan Wu, Jingna Ping, Jinlin Hou
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 37(3): 471.     CrossRef
  • Switching from Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy to Tenofovir Monotherapy in Multidrug-Experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a 5-Year Experience at Two Centers
    Jung Hun Kim, Jeong Han Kim, Won Hyeok Choe, So Young Kwon, Byung-chul Yoo, Eileen L. Yoon, Seong Hee Kang
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical effects of NTCP‐inhibitor myrcludex B
    Dongliang Cheng, Bing Han, Wei Zhang, Wei Wu
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2021; 28(6): 852.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide for chronic hepatitis B patients with a poor response to the previously used nucleos(t)ide analogs
    Daiki Yamashige, Tetsuya Hosaka, Fumitaka Suzuki, Shunichiro Fujiyama, Yusuke Kawamura, Hitomi Sezaki, Norio Akuta, Masahiro Kobayashi, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Satoshi Saitoh, Yasuji Arase, Kenji Ikeda, Mariko Kobayashi, Hiromitsu Kumada
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(11): 1008.     CrossRef
  • Tenofovir‐based combination therapy or monotherapy for multidrug‐resistant chronic hepatitis B: Long‐term data from a multicenter cohort study
    Hyung Joon Yim, Sang Jun Suh, Young Kul Jung, Seong Gyu Hwang, Yeon Seok Seo, Soon Ho Um, Sae Hwan Lee, Young Seok Kim, Jae Young Jang, In Hee Kim, Hyoung Su Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Young Sun Lee, Eileen L. Yoon, Myeong Jun Song, Jun Yong Park
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2020; 27(12): 1306.     CrossRef
  • Identification of a quadruple mutation that confers tenofovir resistance in chronic hepatitis B patients
    Eun-Sook Park, Ah Ram Lee, Doo Hyun Kim, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Sung Hyun Ahn, Heewoo Sim, Soree Park, Hong Seok Kang, Juhee Won, Yea Na Ha, Gu-Choul Shin, So Young Kwon, Yong Kwang Park, Byeong-Sun Choi, Yun Bin Lee, Nakcheol Jeong, Yohan An, Youn
    Journal of Hepatology.2019; 70(6): 1093.     CrossRef
  • Treatment Outcome and Renal Safety of 3-Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Preserved Glomerular Filtration Rate
    In Suk Min, Chang Hun Lee, Ik Sang Shin, Na Eun Lee, Hong Seon Son, Seung Bum Kim, Seung Young Seo, Seong Hun Kim, Sang Wook Kim, Seung Ok Lee, Soo Teik Lee, In Hee Kim
    Gut and Liver.2019; 13(1): 93.     CrossRef
  • KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2019; 25(2): 93.     CrossRef
  • Direct Detection of Drug-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus in Serum Using a Dendron-Modified Microarray
    Doo Hyun Kim, Hong Seok Kang, Seong-Suk Hur, Seobo Sim, Sung Hyun Ahn, Yong Kwang Park, Eun-Sook Park, Ah Ram Lee, Soree Park, So Young Kwon, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Kyun-Hwan Kim
    Gut and Liver.2018; 12(3): 331.     CrossRef
  • Is Combination Antiviral Therapy Mandatory for Maintenance Therapy in Fully Suppressed Multidrug-Resistant Hepatitis B Patients?
    Sung Won Chung, Young Chang, Hyo Young Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Su Jong Yu, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Yoon Jun Kim
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Is tenofovir monotherapy a sufficient defense line against multi-drug resistant hepatitis B virus?
    Yun Bin Lee, Jeong-Hoon Lee
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2017; 23(3): 219.     CrossRef
  • 13,919 View
  • 172 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Editorial

Viral hepatitis

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Desmethylphosphinothricin Dipeptide Derivative Effectively Inhibits Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Growth
    Maxim A. Khomutov, Fabio Giovannercole, Laura Onillon, Marija V. Demiankova, Byazilya F. Vasilieva, Arthur I. Salikhov, Sergey N. Kochetkov, Olga V. Efremenkova, Alex R. Khomutov, Daniela De Biase
    Biomolecules.2023; 13(10): 1451.     CrossRef
  • 10,710 View
  • 113 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Original Articles

Viral hepatitis

Efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (SATIS study)
Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Moon Young Kim, Jung Il Lee, Young Suk Kim, Ki Tae Yoon, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Hoon Ahn
Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22(4):443-449.
Published online November 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0037
Background/Aims
It remains to be determined whether switching from adefovir (ADV) to tenofovir (TDF) provides better virological outcomes in patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV plus nucleoside analogue (ADV+NA) therapy for NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).
Methods
In this prospective trial, patients who showed partial responses (defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >60 IU/mL) to ADV+NA therapy for NA resistance were randomly allocated to receive TDF plus NA (TDF+NA group, n=16) or to continue their current therapy (ADV+NA group, n=16). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete virological response (CVR, defined as serum HBV DNA <60 IU/mL) at 48 weeks.
Result
s: The median age was 52 years (16 men), and 28 were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The proportion with CVR was significantly higher in the TDF+NA group than in the ADV+NA group at 24 weeks (81.3% vs. 25.0%, P=0.001) and 48 weeks (87.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.002). Furthermore, a decrease in the serum HBV DNA level of >2log10 IU/mL was more likely in the TDF+NA group at both 24 and 48 weeks (68.8% vs. 56.3%, P=0.014 vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001, respectively). During the follow-up, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the TDF+NA group than the ADV+NA group (12.5% vs. 6.25%, P=0.640), as was that for the hepatitis B surface antigen (6.25% vs. 0%, P=0.080). No serious adverse events due to antiviral agents occurred.
Conclusions
In patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV+NA therapy for NA-resistant CHB, switching from ADV to TDF might provide better virological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Comparative efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon-alpha monotherapy vs combination therapies with entecavir or tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients
    Huiqing Liang, Xiaoting Zheng, Qianguo Mao, Jiaen Yang, Qingfa Ruan, Chuncheng Wu, Yaoyu Liu, Siyan Chen, Luyun Zhang, Manying Zhang, Hongli Zhuang, Li Lin, Shaodong Chen, Hyun Jin Kwun
    Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of hepatic, hematological, and immunological markers and their temporal dynamics in chronic hepatitis B functional cure
    Jianyong Zeng, Caixia Zheng, Yincheng Zheng, Xiulan Xue, Benjamin M. Liu
    Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Entecavir versus tenofovir on the recurrence of hepatitis B–related HCC after liver transplantation: A multicenter observational study
    Deok-Gie Kim, YoungRok Choi, Jinsoo Rhu, Shin Hwang, Young Kyoung You, Dong-Sik Kim, Yang Won Nah, Bong-Wan Kim, Jai Young Cho, Koo Jeong Kang, Jae Do Yang, Donglak Choi, Dong Jin Joo, Myoung Soo Kim, Je Ho Ryu, Jae Geun Lee
    Liver Transplantation.2023; 29(12): 1272.     CrossRef
  • KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B

    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2022; 28(2): 276.     CrossRef
  • Is tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy still the optimal treatment for chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response?
    Byoung Kuk Jang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2020; 26(3): 312.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Monotherapy for Multidrug-Resistant Chronic HBV infection
    Hye Won Lee, Jun Yong Park, Jin Woo Lee, Ki Tae Yoon, Chang Wook Kim, Hana Park, Young Seok Kim, Soon Ku Paik, Jung Il Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Hoon Ahn
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 17(7): 1348.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the long-term efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Dachuan Cai, Chen Pan, Weihua Yu, Shuangsuo Dang, Jia Li, Shanming Wu, Nan Jiang, Maorong Wang, Zhaohua Zhang, Feng Lin, Shaojie Xin, Yongfeng Yang, Baoshen Shen, Hong Ren
    Medicine.2019; 98(1): e13983.     CrossRef
  • Switching from tenofovir and nucleoside analogue therapy to tenofovir monotherapy in virologically suppressed chronic hepatitis B patients with antiviral resistance
    Dong Yun Kim, Hye Won Lee, Jeong Eun Song, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang‐Hyub Han, Jun Yong Park
    Journal of Medical Virology.2018; 90(3): 497.     CrossRef
  • Step-down Strategy in Antiviral Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Achieved Viral Suppression With Rescue Combination Therapy
    Dong Yun Kim, Jun Yong Park
    Future Virology.2018; 13(10): 711.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of three adefovir‐based combination therapies in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir monotherapy
    M.‐L. Wang, E.‐Q. Chen, D.‐M. Zhang, L.‐Y. Du, L.‐B. Yan, T.‐Y. Zhou, X.‐Z. Lei, B.‐J. Lei, J.‐J. Lu, J. Liao, H. Tang
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2017; 24(S1): 21.     CrossRef
  • 13,388 View
  • 162 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Comparison of the clinical outcomes between antiviral-naïve patients treated with entecavir and lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir add-on lamivudine combination treatment
Hong Joo Kim, Soo Kyung Park, Hyo Joon Yang, Yoon Suk Jung, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Yong Kyun Cho, Chong Il Sohn, Woo Kyu Jeon, Byung Ik Kim, Kyu Yong Choi
Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22(3):350-358.
Published online September 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0019
Background/Aims
To analyze the effects of preexisting lamivudine (LAM) resistance and applying antiviral treatment (adefovir [ADV] add-on LAM combination treatment) on long-term treatment outcomes, and comparing the clinical outcomes of antiviral-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients receiving entecavir (ETV) monotherapy.
Methods
This study enrolled 73 antiviral-naïve patients who received 0.5-mg ETV as an initial therapy and 54 patients who received ADV add-on LAM combination treatment as a rescue therapy from July 2006 to July 2010.
Result
s: During 24-month treatments, the decreases in serum log10HBV-DNA values (copies/mL) were significantly greater in the antiviral-naïve patients treated with ETV than the patients receiving ADV add-on LAM combination treatment. The biochemical response rates for alanine aminotransferase normalization at 6 months (ETV) and 12 months (ADV add-on LAM) were 90.4% (66/73) and 77.8% (42/54), respectively (P=0.048). A Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the rates of serologic response, viral breakthrough, and emergence of genotypic resistance did not differ significantly between the two patient groups. There were also no significant intergroup differences in the rates of disease progression (PD) and new development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Conclusions
The long-term clinical outcomes of antiviral-naïve patients treated with ETV and LAM-resistant patients receiving ADV add-on LAM combination treatment were comparable in terms of the emergence of HCC and disease progression.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of antiviral regimens for entecavir-resistant hepatitis B: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Si-Si Yang, Cheng-Wei Cai, Xue-Qing Ma, Jia Xu, Cheng-Bo Yu
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International.2020; 19(6): 507.     CrossRef
  • 11,837 View
  • 142 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
Jeong Han Kim, Sung Hyun Ahn, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, Kyun-Hwan Kim, So Young Kwon
Clin Mol Hepatol 2016;22(2):241-249.
Published online June 15, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2015.0053
Background/Aims
Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy and investigated the clinical and clonal results of TDF-based rescue therapy in CHB patients refractory to this combination. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CHB patients treated for up to 3 years with ETV-ADV combination therapy as a rescue therapy for drug resistance. In cases refractory to this combination, clinical and clonal analyses were performed for TDF-based rescue therapy. Results: The analysis was performed on 48 patients. Twelve patients achieved a virological response (VR) within 3 years. A VR was subsequently achieved in nine of the ten patients without a VR who switched to TDF monotherapy. A VR was also achieved in six of the seven patients who switched to lamivudine-TDF combination therapy, and in two of the two patients who switched to ETV-TDF combination therapy. In an in vitro susceptibility test, viral replication was detected with TDF monotherapy but not with ETV-TDF combination therapy. Conclusions: The efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy was insufficient in CHB patients who were refractory to rescue therapy. A more potent regimen such as ETV-TDF combination therapy may be considered in such refractory cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Switching from Tenofovir-Based Combination Therapy to Tenofovir Monotherapy in Multidrug-Experienced Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: a 5-Year Experience at Two Centers
    Jung Hun Kim, Jeong Han Kim, Won Hyeok Choe, So Young Kwon, Byung-chul Yoo, Eileen L. Yoon, Seong Hee Kang
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Delayed viral suppression during antiviral therapy is associated with increased hepatocellular carcinoma rates in HBeAg‐positive high viral load chronic hepatitis B
    J. Y. Nam, Y. Chang, H. Cho, S. H. Kang, Y. Y. Cho, E. J. Cho, J.‐H. Lee, S. J. Yu, J.‐H. Yoon, Y. J. Kim
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2018; 25(5): 552.     CrossRef
  • Adherence, virological outcome, and drug resistance in Chinese HIV patients receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy from 2011 to 2015
    Pengtao Liu, Lingjie Liao, Wei Xu, Jing Yan, Zhongbao Zuo, Xuebing Leng, Jing Wang, Wei Kan, Yinghui You, Hui Xing, Yuhua Ruan, Yiming Shao
    Medicine.2018; 97(50): e13555.     CrossRef
  • Is the tenofovir based therapy almighty for previous treatment failure in chronic hepatitis B?
    Hyung Joon Yim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2016; 22(2): 238.     CrossRef
  • 13,009 View
  • 141 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Hepatitis B surface antigen levels at 6 months after treatment can predict the efficacy of lamivudine-adefovir combination therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B
Jeong Han Kim, Hee Won Moon, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, So Young Kwon
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(3):274-282.
Published online September 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.274
Background/Aims

Quantitation of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is an increasingly popular method to determine the treatment response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. The clinical value of HBsAg level measurement during rescue therapy for lamivudine (LMV)-resistant CHB patients have not been evaluated to date. Therefore, this study investigated the correlation between HBsAg level and treatment response in LMV-resistant CHB patients treated with adefovir (ADV) add-on therapy.

Methods

LMV-resistant CHB patients treated with LMV-ADV combination therapy for over 2 years were included. HBsAg levels were measured at 6 month intervals until 1 year, and annually thereafter. Treatment response was assessed by determining the virological response (VR, undetectable HBV DNA levels) during treatment.

Results

Fifty patients were included, of which 40 showed a VR. HBsAg levels were not different significantly at baseline (4.0 vs. 3.6 Log10 IU/mL, P=0.072). However, the HBsAg level decreased after 6 months of treatment in patients with a VR and became different significantly between the groups thereafter (3.9 vs. 3.3 at 6 months, P=0.002; 3.8 vs. 3.2 at 1 year, P=0.004; 3.9 vs. 3.2 at 2 years, P=0.008; 3.7 vs. 3.1 at 3 years, P =0.020).

Conclusions

The HBsAg level at 6 months after treatment can help predict treatment response.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Blood Levels of Glutamine and Nitrotyrosine in Patients with Chronic Viral Hepatitis
    Hussam Murad, Haythum O Tayeb, Mahmoud Mosli, Misbahuddin Rafeeq, Mohammed Basheikh
    International Journal of General Medicine.2021; Volume 14: 8753.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
    Jeong Han Kim, Sung Hyun Ahn, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, Kyun-Hwan Kim, So Young Kwon
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2016; 22(2): 241.     CrossRef
  • 9,702 View
  • 48 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Long-term outcomes of two rescue therapies in lamivudine-refractory patients with chronic hepatitis B: combined lamivudine and adefovir, and 1-mg entecavir
EunYoung Ze, Eun Kyung Baek, Jong Jin Lee, Han Wook Chung, Dae Geon Ahn, Hwan Jun Cho, Jae Cheol Kwon, Hyung Joon Kim, HyunWoong Lee
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(3):267-273.
Published online September 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.267
Background/Aims

Adefovir (ADV) and lamivudine (LAM) combination therapy (ADV+LAM) has been a useful option for patients with LAM-resistant (LAM-r) chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the long-term outcomes of LAM+ADV and 1-mg entecavir (ETV) rescue therapies have still been limited. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of these two rescue therapies.

Methods

Sixty patients with LAM-r CHB underwent rescue therapy with LAM+ADV (n=36) or 1-mg ETV (n=24). We determined the duration of rescue therapy, timing and type of mutation, undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA by PCR (lower limitation of detection, < 140 copies/mL), biochemical response (alanine aminotransferase < 40 IU/mL), and the incidence of hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion and virologic breakthrough.

Results

Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two therapy groups. The duration of rescue therapy was 56 months (range, 14-100 months) in the ADV+LAM group and 42 months (range, 12-73 months) in the ETV group (P=0.036). The cumulative rates of HBV DNA undetectability and HBeAg seroconversion up to 6 years were 88.6% and 43.0%, respectively, in the ADV+LAM group, and 45.8% and 31.8% in the ETV group. The rate of virologic breakthrough and resistance was 14.4% in the ADV+LAM group and 71.9% in the ETV group (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Combination of LAM and ADV therapy for up to 6 years achieved modest rates of virological suppression and resistance. ETV is not an optimal therapy because the risk of viral breakthrough to ETV increases over time.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection
    Markus Cornberg, Lisa Sandmann, Jerzy Jaroszewicz, Patrick Kennedy, Pietro Lampertico, Maud Lemoine, Sabela Lens, Barbara Testoni, Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Francesco Paolo Russo
    Journal of Hepatology.2025; 83(2): 502.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of replication competence of wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus isolates from a chronic hepatitis B patient
    Quan Zhang, Junhao Chen, Mingjie Pan, Jingli Liu, Tingting Liu, Yi-Hua Zhou
    Virus Research.2018; 255: 165.     CrossRef
  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study
    Scott Fung, Peter Kwan, Milotka Fabri, Andrzej Horban, Mijomir Pelemis, Hie-Won Hann, Selim Gurel, Florin A. Caruntu, John F. Flaherty, Benedetta Massetto, Kyungpil Kim, Kathryn M. Kitrinos, G. Mani Subramanian, John G. McHutchison, Leland J. Yee, Magdy E
    Journal of Hepatology.2017; 66(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • The clinical implication of single nucleotide polymorphisms in deoxycytidine kinase in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with lamivudine
    Hyun Woong Lee, Sung Hee Lee, Min Goo Lee, Sang Hoon Ahn, Hye Young Chang, Kwang‐Hyub Han
    Journal of Medical Virology.2016; 88(5): 820.     CrossRef
  • Antiviral Therapy in Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hui-Lian Wang, Xi Lu, Xudong Yang, Nan Xu
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine/entecavir

    Reactions Weekly.2015; 1568(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • 10,983 View
  • 79 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Rescue therapy with adefovir in decompensated liver cirrhosis patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus
Hyun Young Woo, Jong Young Choi, Seung Kew Yoon, Dong Jin Suh, Seung Woon Paik, Kwang Hyub Han, Soon Ho Um, Byung Ik Kim, Heon Ju Lee, Mong Cho, Chun Kyon Lee, Dong Joon Kim, Jae Seok Hwang
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(2):168-176.
Published online June 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.2.168
Background/Aims

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is a nucleotide analogue that is effective against lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcomes after ADV rescue therapy in decompensated patients infected with lamivudine-resistant HBV.

Methods

In total, 128 patients with a decompensated state and lamivudine-resistant HBV were treated with ADV at a dosage of 10 mg/day for a median of 33 months in this multicenter cohort study.

Results

Following ADV treatment, 86 (72.3%) of 119 patients experienced a decrease in Child-Pugh score of at least 2 points, and the overall end-stage liver disease score decreased from 16±5 to 14±10 (mean ± SD, P<0.001) during the follow-up period. With ADV treatment, 67 patients (56.3%) had undetectable serum HBV DNA (detection limit, 0.5 pg/mL). Virologic breakthrough occurred in 38 patients (36.1%) and 9 patients had a suboptimal ADV response. The overall survival rate was 89.9% (107/119), and a suboptimal response to ADV treatment was associated with both no improvement in Child-Pugh score (≥2 points; P=0.001) and high mortality following ADV rescue therapy (P=0.012).

Conclusions

Three years of ADV treatment was effective and safe in decompensated patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Targeting hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy: efficacy and challenges of current antiviral treatments
    Yongzheng Hu, Yue Zhang, Wei Jiang
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in the treatment of HIV patients with compensated cirrhosis
    Baochi Liu, Mingrong Cheng, Xiaodong Chen, Lei Li, Yanhui Si, Shijia Wang, Ying Wang, Yufang Shi
    Bioscience Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the prevalence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus in patients with antiviral therapy failure in a Chinese tertiary referral liver centre (2010–2014)
    Tian Meng, Xiaofeng Shi, Xuyang Gong, Haijun Deng, Yao Huang, Xuefeng Shan, Youlan Shan, Ailong Huang, Quanxin Long
    Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance.2017; 8: 74.     CrossRef
  • 11,859 View
  • 65 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy for lamivudine resistance in hepatitis-B-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Jeong Han Kim, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, So Young Kwon, Chang Hong Lee
Clin Mol Hepatol 2013;19(3):273-279.
Published online September 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2013.19.3.273
Background/Aims

Lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy has been accepted as one of the best treatments for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of this combination therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods

The medical records of CHB patients who developed LAM resistance and were treated with LAM plus ADV combination therapy for more than 6 months were reviewed. Their virological response (VR; undetectable HBV DNA) and biochemical response (BR; alanine aminotransferase normalization) were evaluated, and the findings of HCC and non-HCC patients were compared.

Results

The data from 104 patients (19 with HCC and 85 without HCC) were analyzed. The VR rates did not differ significantly between the HCC and non-HCC groups: 33.3% vs. 55.6% at 12 months (P=0.119), 58.3% vs. 67.2% at 24 months (P=0.742), 50% vs. 69.8% at 36 months (P=0.280), and 66.7% vs. 71.0% at 48 months (P=1.000). The BR rates also did not differ significantly between the groups: 55.6% vs. 84.0% at 12 months (P=0.021), 58.3% vs. 83.8% at 24 months (P=0.057), 70.0% vs. 77.8% at 36 months (P=0.687), and 66.7% vs. 80.6% at 48 months (P=0.591).

Conclusions

The efficacy of LAM plus ADV combination therapy is comparable in HCC and non-HCC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Antiviral therapies for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yuan-Qing Zhang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(13): 3860.     CrossRef
  • 10,173 View
  • 45 Download
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Antiviral efficacies of currently available rescue therapies for multidrug-resistant chronic hepatitis B
Mi Sung Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Kyung Sik Kim, Ja Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Oidov Baartarkhuu, Kwang Hyub Han, Chae Yoon Chon, Sang Hoon Ahn
Korean J Hepatol 2013;19(1):29-35.
Published online March 25, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2013.19.1.29
Background/Aims

The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during sequential lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment is increasing. We investigated the antiviral efficacies of various rescue regimens in patients who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment.

Methods

Forty-eight patients (83.3% of whom were HBeAg-positive) who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment were treated with one of the following regimens: entecavir (ETV) (1 mg) monotherapy (n=16), LAM+ADV combination therapy (n=20), or ETV (1 mg)+ADV combination therapy (n=12). All patients had confirmed genotypic resistance to both LAM and ADV and were evaluated every 12 weeks.

Results

The baseline characteristics and treatment duration did not differ significantly among the study groups. During the treatment period (median duration: 100 weeks), the decline of serum HBV DNA from baseline tended to be greatest in the ETV+ADV group at all-time points (week 48: -2.55 log10 IU/mL, week 96: -4.27 log10 IU/mL), but the difference was not statistically significant. The ETV+ADV group also tended to have higher virologic response rates at 96 weeks compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (40.0% vs. 20.0% or 20.0%, P=0.656), and less virologic breakthrough was observed compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (8.3% vs. 37.5% or 30.0%; P=0.219), but again, the differences were not statistically significant. HBeAg loss occurred in one patient in the ETV+ADV group, in two in the ETV monotherapy group, and in none of the LAM+ADV group. The safety profiles were similar in each arm.

Conclusions

There was a nonsignificant tendency toward better antiviral efficacy with ETV+ADV combination therapy compared to LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy for MDR CHB in Korea, where tenofovir is not yet available.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • ALT Is Not Associated With Achieving Subcirrhotic Liver Stiffness and HCC During Entecavir Therapy in HBV-Related Cirrhosis
    Mi Na Kim, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Se Young Jang, Won Young Tak, Young-Oh Kweon, Soo Young Park, Seung Up Kim
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 21(9): 2278.     CrossRef
  • Revised Korean Antiviral Guideline Reduces the Hepatitis B-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Cirrhotic Patients
    David Sooik Kim, Soo Young Park, Beom Kyung Kim, Jun Yong Park, Do Young Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Yu Rim Lee, Won Young Tak, Young Oh Kweon, Inkyung Jung, Minkyung Han, Eun Hwa Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Seung Up Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Entecavir-based combination therapies for chronic hepatitis B
    Aoran Luo, Xiaoyan Jiang, Hong Ren
    Medicine.2018; 97(51): e13596.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between the Response-Guided Therapies and Monotherapies of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in China
    Keng Lai, Chi Zhang, Weixia Ke, Yanhui Gao, Shudong Zhou, Li Liu, Yi Yang
    Clinical Drug Investigation.2017; 37(3): 233.     CrossRef
  • De novo entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations resulting from sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil, and lamivudine
    Song Yang, Huichun Xing, Qi Wang, Xiaomei Wang, Shunai Liu, Jun Cheng
    Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy
    Jeong Han Kim, Sung Hyun Ahn, Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe, Kyun-Hwan Kim, So Young Kwon
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2016; 22(2): 241.     CrossRef
  • Lamivudine-resistant rtL180M and rtM204I/V are persistently dominant during combination rescue therapy with entecavir and adefovir for hepatitis B
    YANG WANG, SHUANG LIU, YU CHEN, SUJUN ZHENG, LI ZHOU, FENGMIN LU, ZHONGPING DUAN
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2016; 11(6): 2293.     CrossRef
  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in Korea: data from the clinical practice setting in a single-center cohort
    Sung Soo Ahn, Young Eun Chon, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn, Kwang-Hyub Han, Jun Yong Park
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2014; 20(3): 261.     CrossRef
  • Oral antiviral agents for treatment of chronic hepatitis B
    Soon Young Ko, Won Hyeok Choe
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2014; 57(1): 60.     CrossRef
  • Relevance of hepatitis B surface antigen levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B during 5 year of tenofovir treatment
    A. K. Singh, M. K. Sharma, S. S. Hissar, E. Gupta, S. K. Sarin
    Journal of Viral Hepatitis.2014; 21(6): 439.     CrossRef
  • Options for the management of antiviral resistance during hepatitis B therapy: reflections on battles over a decade
    Hyung Joon Yim, Seong Gyu Hwang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2013; 19(3): 195.     CrossRef
  • 10,509 View
  • 63 Download
  • Crossref
High efficacy of adefovir and entecavir combination therapy in patients with nucleoside-refractory hepatitis B
Hee Bok Chae, Mee Jin Kim, Eui Geun Seo, Yong Hyeok Choi, Hee Seung Lee, Joung Ho Han, Soon Man Yoon, Seon Mee Park, Sei Jin Youn
Korean J Hepatol 2012;18(1):75-83.
Published online March 22, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2012.18.1.75
Background/Aims

Newly developed and potent antiviral agents suffer from the problem of drug resistance. Multidrug resistance is a major impediment in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In line with American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidelines, adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) add-on therapy is recommended in the case of lamivudine resistance, while tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is recommended for ADV or entecavir (ETV) resistance. TDF is currently not available in Korea. ADV+ETV combination therapy may be a viable alternative to TDF in patients with either ADV or ETV resistance. However, the efficacy of ADV+ETV combination therapy in patients with CHB and multidrug resistance is unclear. This study investigated the efficacy of ADV+ETV combination therapy in patients with multidrug resistance.

Methods

Twenty-five patients were enrolled and were administered ADV+ETV combination therapy for at least 6 months. Blood was drawn at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after commencing treatment, and the following blood parameters were analyzed: alanine transaminase, hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), anti-hepatitis B e-antigen, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. The initial virological response (IVR) was defined as an HBV DNA level of <4 log10 copies/mL after 6 months of combination therapy.

Results

The IVR rate was 76%. The proportion of patients with a high viral load (≥5.0 log) dropped from 76% at baseline to only 5% after 6 months of treatment. The biochemical response rate during the first 6 months was 71%. HBeAg was lost in 2 patients (10%).

Conclusions

ADV+ETV combination therapy induced a good IVR in CHB patients who were refractory to more than 2 antiviral agents. This regimen may be a good alternative to TDF in Korea, where that drug is not available.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Entecavir Interacts with Influx Transporters hOAT1, hCNT2, hCNT3, but Not with hOCT2: The Potential for Renal Transporter-Mediated Cytotoxicity and Drug–Drug Interactions
    Jana Mandíková, Marie Volková, Petr Pávek, Lucie Navrátilová, Lucie Hyršová, Zlatko Janeba, Jan Pavlík, Pavel Bárta, František Trejtnar
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tenofovir rescue regimen following prior suboptimal response to entecavir and adefovir combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients exposed to multiple treatment failures
    Qian Zhang, Tao Han, Cai‐Yun Nie, Fu‐Shuang Ha, Lei Liu, Hua Liu
    Journal of Medical Virology.2015; 87(6): 1013.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Combination Therapy on the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B
    Xun Qi, Jinyu Wang, Liang Chen, Yuxian Huang, Yanli Qin, Richeng Mao, Jiming Zhang
    Medicine.2015; 94(15): e646.     CrossRef
  • Entecavir plus adefovir versus adefovir plus lamivudine in hepatitis B virus e antigen‐positive, lamivudine‐resistant chronic hepatitis B
    Jeong Heo, Sang Hoon Ahn, Young‐Oh Kweon, Byung‐Ho Kim, Henry L Y Chan, Andrzej Horban, Suchat Wongcharatrawee, Cyril Llamoso, Kwan Sik Lee
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2014; 29(7): 1485.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of 2years of entecavir plus adefovir therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B who had failed on prior nucleos(t)ide analog treatment
    Xiaohong Wang, Changjiang Zhang, Yan Zhu, Yulin Xiong, Yuming Wang
    Antiviral Research.2014; 103: 71.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Lamivudine Plus Adefovir Therapy Versus Entecavir With or Without Adefovir Therapy for Adefovir-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
    Seong Hee Kang, Hyung Joon Yim, Hae Rim Kim, Keunhee Kang, Sang Jun Suh, Hyun Jung Lee, Eileen L. Yoon, Ji Hoon Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Jong Eun Yeon, Kwan Soo Byun
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2014; 48(10): 889.     CrossRef
  • Management of antiviral drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B
    Ki Bae Bang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 20(33): 11641.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir and Lamivudine Combination Therapy in Patients with Entecavir-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B: Antiviral Responses and Evolution of Mutations
    Hyung Joon Yim, Hyun Jung Lee, Sang Jun Suh, Yeon Seok Seo, Chang Wook Kim, Chang Don Lee, Sang Hoon Park, Myung Seok Lee, Choong Kee Park, Hee Bok Chae, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik, Yun Soo Kim, Ju Hyun Kim, Jung Il Lee, Jin Woo Lee, Sun Pyo Hong, Soon
    Intervirology.2014; 57(5): 239.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Factors for Delayed Virologic Response of Adefovir Add-on Therapy in Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
    Ae Rin Baek, Dae Yong Kim, Young Seok Kim, Sang Gyune Kim, Jung Hyun Kim, Min Suk Kim, Tae Jin Kim, Yun Nah Lee, Sae Hwan Lee, Soung Won Jeong, Jae Young Jang, Hong Soo Kim, Boo Sung Kim
    Soonchunhyang Medical Science.2013; 19(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • OAT1 and OAT3: Targets of drug–drug interaction between entecavir and JBP485
    Qinghan Xu, Changyuan Wang, Qiang Meng, Qi Liu, Huijun Sun, Jinyong Peng, Xiaochi Ma, Taiichi Kaku, Kexin Liu
    European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2013; 48(4-5): 650.     CrossRef
  • Options for the management of antiviral resistance during hepatitis B therapy: reflections on battles over a decade
    Hyung Joon Yim, Seong Gyu Hwang
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2013; 19(3): 195.     CrossRef
  • Entecavir plus adefovir rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients after multiple treatment failures in real-life practice
    Xian-Hua Xu, Gai-Li Li, Yang Qin, Qiang Li, Fa-Qun He, Jin-Ye Li, Quan-Rong Pan, Jie-Yin Deng
    Virology Journal.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 10,240 View
  • 45 Download
  • Crossref
Virologic response is not durable after adefovir discontinuation in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
Young Kul Jung, Jong Eun Yeon, Kwang Gyun Lee, Eun Seok Jung, Jeong Han Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Yeon Seok Seo, Hyung Joon Yim, Sun Ho Um, Ho Sang Ryu, Kwan Soo Byun
Korean J Hepatol 2011;17(4):261-267.
Published online December 26, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.4.261
Background/Aims

We investigated the durability of the biochemical and virologic responses after adefovir (ADV) discontinuation in lamivudine-resistant (LMV-R) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, and the outcomes of ADV discontinuation compared to that of ADV maintenance.

Methods

The indication for ADV treatment cessation was an undetectable level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA documented on two occasions at least 6 months apart. All patients received additional ADV for at least 12 months after the confirmation of undetectable HBV DNA (Cobas TaqMan PCR assay, <70 copies/mL). Of 36 patients who had a sufficient ADV therapeutic effect, 19 discontinued ADV treatment, while the others maintained it. A virologic rebound was arbitrarily defined as the redetection of HBV DNA at a level higher than 105 copies/mL.

Results

In the ADV discontinuation group, ADV treatment and additional therapy were administered for medians of 33 months (range, 12-47 months) and 18 months, respectively. The patients were followed for a median of 12 months (range, 3-30 months) after ADV cessation. During that period, 18 of 19 patients (95%) experienced viral relapse. Viral rebound was observed in six patients (32%). However, 12 of 18 patients (67%) exhibited serum HBV DNA levels of less than 105 copies/mL. Biochemical relapses were observed in four of the six patients with viral rebound. In the ADV maintenance group, patients were treated for a median of 53 months (range, 31-85 months), and 9 patients (53%) experienced viral breakthrough.

Conclusions

During short-term follow-up after ADV discontinuation, most patients (95%) exhibited viral relapse, whereas and viral breakthrough occurred in about half of patients (53%) maintained on ADV therapy. Therefore, the durability of virologic response after ADV discontinuation in LMV-R patients was unsatisfactory. In addition, and viral breakthrough was not infrequent in the ADV continuation group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Systematic review: Clinical outcomes of discontinuation of oral antivirals in hepatitis B-related liver cirrhosis
    Yuhao Yao, Jiaxin Zhang, Xiaoke Li, Xiaobin Zao, Xu Cao, Guang Chen, Yong'an Ye
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Perspectives on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Issam Tout, Pietro Lampertico, Thomas Berg, Tarik Asselah
    Antiviral Research.2021; 185: 104992.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in the discontinuation of chronic hepatitis B antiviral agents
    Apichat Kaewdech, Pimsiri Sripongpun
    World Journal of Hepatology.2021; 13(9): 1042.     CrossRef
  • Risks and Benefits of Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment: A Treatment Concept for Patients With HBeAg‐Negative Chronic Hepatitis B
    Florian van Bömmel, Thomas Berg
    Hepatology Communications.2021; 5(10): 1632.     CrossRef
  • Stopping long‐term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues is a favourable option for selected patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B
    Florian van Bömmel, Thomas Berg
    Liver International.2018; 38(S1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Why not to stop antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Sebastián Marciano, Adrián Gadano
    Liver International.2018; 38(S1): 97.     CrossRef
  • Is it possible to stop nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients?
    Elia Moreno-Cubero, Robert T Sánchez del Arco, Julia Peña-Asensio, Eduardo Sanz de Villalobos, Joaquín Míquel, Juan Ramón Larrubia
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(17): 1825.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and predictors for relapse after cessation of oral antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients
    Kyu Sik Jung, Jun Yong Park, Young Eun Chon, Hyon-Suk Kim, Wonseok Kang, Beom Kyung Kim, Seung Up Kim, Do Young Kim, Kwang-Hyub Han, Sang Hoon Ahn
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 51(8): 830.     CrossRef
  • Discontinuation of oral antivirals in chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review
    George Papatheodoridis, Ioannis Vlachogiannakos, Evangelos Cholongitas, Karsten Wursthorn, Christos Thomadakis, Giota Touloumi, Jörg Petersen
    Hepatology.2016; 63(5): 1481.     CrossRef
  • Treatment cessation of entecavir in Asian patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B: a multicentre prospective study
    Wai-Kay Seto, Aric Josun Hui, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Grace Lai-Hung Wong, Kevin Sze-Hang Liu, Ching-Lung Lai, Man-Fung Yuen, Henry Lik-Yuen Chan
    Gut.2015; 64(4): 667.     CrossRef
  • 9,285 View
  • 53 Download
  • Crossref
Virologic response to adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy is not durable in HBeAg-positive, Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
Hyun Wook Jung , Moon Seok Choi , Kap Hyun Kim , Sung Hyun Park , Keum Yeon Kwak , Joon Hyoek Lee , Kwang Cheol Koh , Seung Woon Paik , Byung Chul Yoo
Korean J Hepatol 2009;15(1):52-58.
Published online March 31, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2009.15.1.52
Backgrounds/Aims
It has been shown that adefovir dipivoxil is an effective antiviral agent in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), not only in wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but also in lamivudine-resistant (LAMV-R) cases. However, little is known about the durability of the virologic response to adefovir in LAMV-R CHB patients. Methods: Fifteen HBV e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive, LAMV-R CHB patients showed a virologic response to adefovir monotherapy. These patients received additional adefovir for at least a further 12 months. The virologic relapse rate after discontinuation of adefovir was evaluated. In addition, predictive factors associated with virologic relapse were investigated. Results: The median level of serum HBV DNA before adefovir administration was 7,457,840 IU/mL (range 107,920-99,524,960 IU/mL). The median duration of adefovir treatment was 30 months (range 14-46 months). During a median follow-up period of 14 months after discontinuation of adefovir, the 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month cumulative relapse rates were 26.7%, 53.3%, 73.3%, 80%, and 80%, respectively. High pretreatment HBV DNA levels were found to be the only factor that was predictive of off-therapy relapse. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the adefovir-monotherapy-induced virologic response is not durable in most patients with LAMV-R HBeAg-positive CHB, especially in those with a high pretreatment HBV DNA level. (Korean J Hepatol 2008;15:52-58)
  • 5,622 View
  • 21 Download
The efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy and the incidence of genotypic resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in patients with Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection
Jae Hyeon Moon , Mong Cho , Ki Tae Yoon , Jung Ho Bae , Jeong Heo , Gwang Ha Kim , Dae Hwan Kang , Geun Am Song
Korean J Hepatol 2008;14(4):503-512.
Published online December 31, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2008.14.4.503
Background/Aims
Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is a nucleotide analogue that inhibits wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) and lamivudine (LMV)-resistant HBV mutants. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of ADV monotherapy and the incidence of genotypic resistance to ADV in patients with LMV-resistant chronic HBV infection. Methods: This study involved 124 patients with chronic HBV infection who had received ADV monotherapy due to the presence of LMV-resistant HBV mutants. The efficacy of ADV was evaluated by the normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and by the reduction of serum HBV DNA level (with cutoff levels of 2×104 IU/mL and 2×102 IU/mL). The cumulative rate of HBeAg loss or seroconversion was assessed in HBeAg-positive patients. The development of mutations in the reverse trancriptase region of HBV DNA polymerase was evaluated by direct sequencing analysis during ADV monotherapy. Results: The mean serum HBV DNA level was 5.94 log10IU/mL. At 12 and 24 months after ADV monotherapy, the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 69.4% and 75.5%, respectively, and those of serum HBV DNA reduction were 79.8% and 89.2% for a cutoff level of 2×104 IU/mL, and 44.2% and 59.0% for a cutoff of 2×102 IU/mL. The mean serum HBV DNA levels at 12 and 24 months were significantly lower than baseline, at 3.24 and 3.04 log10IU/mL, respectively (P<0.001). At 12 months after ADV treatment, the cumulative rates of HBeAg loss and seroconversion were 15.8% and 10.5%, respectively, and the rtN236T and rtA181T/V mutants in HBV DNA polymerase were identified in 25% and 64% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Although ADV monotherapy is effective, it leads to a high rate of mutations of HBV DNA reverse transcriptase gene in patients with chronic HBV infections who have LMV-resistant HBV mutants. (Korean J Hepatol 2008;14:503-512)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Analysis of Reverse Transcriptase Gene Mutations in the Hepatitis B Virus at a University Hospital in Korea
    A-Jin Lee, Chang Hyeong Lee, Chang-Ho Jeon
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2014; 34(3): 230.     CrossRef
  • A Low Viral Load Predicts a Higher Initial Virologic Response to Adefovir in Patients with Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
    Su Rin Shin, Kwang Cheol Koh, Geum-Youn Gwak, Moon Seok Choi, Joon Hyoek Lee, Seung Woon Paik, Byung Chul Yoo
    Gut and Liver.2010; 4(4): 530.     CrossRef
  • 5,430 View
  • 17 Download
  • Crossref

Case Report

A case of severe hypophosphatemia related to adefovir dipivoxil treatment in a patient with Liver cirrhosis related to hepatitis B virus
Heon Ju Lee , Tae Nyeun Kim , Jong Ryul Eun , Jae Won Choi
Korean J Hepatol 2008;14(3):381-386.
Published online September 30, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2008.14.3.381
Adefovir dipivoxyl (ADV) effectively suppresses hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication but exhibits nephrotoxicity with severe hypophosphatemia when administered at a high dosage. This is the first report of severe hypophosphatemic osteomalacia induced by ADV at 10 mg/day. A 42-year-old man with HBV-related chronic liver disease presented with generalized bone pain, especially in the left ankle. He had been taking ADV for more than 1.5 years following a clinical breakthrough due to lamivudine-resistant HBV. Aggravating severe hypophosphatemia and elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels with high bone fraction had been noted after 6 months of ADV therapy. Bone densitometry, simple bone X-rays, and a whole-body bone scan demonstrated osteoporosis and multiple areas with hot uptake, especially in the left ankle. All the image findings and symptoms improved after correcting the hypophosphatemia. (Korean J Hepatol 2008;14:381-386)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Osteomalacia e hipofosfatemia inducida por adefovir
    José Antonio López Medina, Víctor José Simón Frapolli, Francisco José Tinahones Madueño
    Medicina Clínica.2022; 158(5): 245.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir-induced osteomalacia and hypophosphatemia
    José Antonio López Medina, Víctor José Simón Frapolli, Francisco José Tinahones Madueño
    Medicina Clínica (English Edition).2022; 158(5): 245.     CrossRef
  • Follow-Up of Adefovir Dipivoxil Induced Osteomalacia: Clinical Characteristics and Genetic Predictors
    Jiao Zhao, Wei-guang Feng, Zhe Wei, Jian Zhou, Xiao-yun Chen, Zhen-lin Zhang
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of adefovir dipivoxil–induced Fanconi’s syndrome in the Chinese population
    Linli Sun, Dan Yi, Wei Sun, Chunjiang Wang
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2020; 45(4): 722.     CrossRef
  • Nephrolithiasis and Osteomalacia associated with adefovir-induced Fanconi syndrome in a patient with hepatitis B
    Jueying Lin, Yufeng Zhuo, Dongdong Zhang
    BMC Nephrology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Misdiagnosis of Bone Metastasis Cancer After Using Adefovir Dipivoxi in a Hepatitis B Patient with Fanconi Syndrome
    Xin Li, Man Shen, Wan-jun Sun, Zhong-xia Huang, Na An, Jia-jia Zhang
    Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion.2016; 32(S1): 329.     CrossRef
  • Low-Dose Adefovir Dipivoxil May Induce Fanconi Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term follow-up for Chinese Patients
    Li-Jun Xu, Yan Jiang, Ruo-Xi Liao, Hua-Bing Zhang, Jiang-Feng Mao, Yue Chi, Mei Li, Ou Wang, Xiao-Qing Liu, Zheng-Yin Liu, Xiao-Ping Xing, Wei Yu, Wei-Bo Xia
    Antiviral Therapy.2015; 20(6): 603.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir-induced Fanconi syndrome: diagnostic pearls and perils of late or missed diagnosis
    Samuel Shang Ming Lee, Timothy Peng Lim Quek, Cherng Jye Seow, Melvin Khee Shing Leow
    CEN Case Reports.2014; 3(2): 183.     CrossRef
  • Two Cases of Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia After Long-term Low Dose Adefovir Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B and Literature Review
    Hye Jin Jeong, Ji Min Lee, Tae Han Lee, Ji Yeon Lee, Han Byeol Kim, Mi Hwa Heo, Go Choi, Jin Nyeong Chae, Ji-Min Kim, Sang-Hyon Kim, Kun Young Kwon
    Journal of Bone Metabolism.2014; 21(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia Due to Drug-induced Fanconi's Syndrome Associated with Adefovir Dipivoxil Treatment for Hepatitis B
    Hiroyuki Eguchi, Munehisa Tsuruta, Junichi Tani, Reiichiro Kuwahara, Yuji Hiromatsu
    Internal Medicine.2014; 53(3): 233.     CrossRef
  • Nephrogenic hypophosphatemic osteomalacia during adefovir monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B monoinfection
    Yaowen Xu, Pingyan Shen, Xiaoxia Pan, Nan Chen
    Clinical Kidney Journal.2013; 6(4): 379.     CrossRef
  • Bone Scintigraphic Findings of Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia Associated With Adefovir Therapy
    Do-Hoon Kim, Sang-Woo Lee, Young Oh Kweon, Jaetae Lee, Byeong-Cheol Ahn
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2013; 38(5): 378.     CrossRef
  • Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia and renal Fanconi syndrome induced by low-dose adefovir dipivoxil: a case report and literature review suggesting ethnic predisposition
    C. Wu, H. Zhang, Y. Qian, L. Wang, X. Gu, Z. Dai
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2013; 38(4): 321.     CrossRef
  • Hypophosphatemic osteomalacia induced by low-dose adefovir therapy: focus on manifestations in the skeletal system and literature review
    Du Hwan Kim, Duk Hyun Sung, Yong Ki Min
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.2013; 31(2): 240.     CrossRef
  • Pathological femoral fractures due to osteomalacia associated with adefovir dipivoxil treatment for hepatitis B: a case report
    Motoyuki Tanaka, Takao Setoguchi, Yasuhiro Ishidou, Yoshiya Arishima, Masataka Hirotsu, Yoshinobu Saitoh, Shunsuke Nakamura, Hironori Kakoi, Satoshi Nagano, Masahiro Yokouchi, Junichi Kamizono, Setsuro Komiya
    Diagnostic Pathology.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Predicting the Effi cacy of Adefovir Dipivoxil on Treatment-Naïve Chronic Hepatitis B Patients at 48 Weeks
    Li-Chun Wang, En-Qiang Chen, Xiao-Feng Zhu, Zhong-Hua Xiong, Li Liu, Lu Xu, Xue-Zhong Lei, Cong Liu, Hong Tang
    Gut and Liver.2011; 5(4): 478.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir induced hypophosphatemic osteomalacia
    Gianluigi Fabbriciani, Giuseppe Vittorio L. de Socio, Marco Massarotti, Roberto Ceriani, Bianca Marasini
    Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases.2011; 43(11-12): 990.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Osteomalacia Related to Adefovir in a Patient with Chronic Hepatitis B
    Su Young Ahn, Soon Young Ko, Yun Mi Jang, Yong Hoon Choi, Byung Kook Kim, Won Hyeok Choe, Chang Hong Lee, So Young Kwon
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2010; 56(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • Fanconi's Syndrome Associated with Prolonged Adefovir Dipivoxil Therapy in a Hepatitis B Virus Patient
    Young Kul Jung, Jong Eun Yeon†, Jong Hwan Choi†, Chung Ho Kim†, Eun Suk Jung†, Ji Hoon Kim†, Jong Jae Park†, Jae Seon Kim†, Young-Tae Bak†, Kwan Soo Byun†
    Gut and Liver.2010; 4(3): 389.     CrossRef
  • Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia after Low-Dose Adefovir Dipivoxil Therapy for Hepatitis B
    Tang Wong, Christian M. Girgis, Meng C. Ngu, Roger C. Y. Chen, Louise Emmett, Katherine A. Archer, Markus J. Seibel
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2010; 95(2): 479.     CrossRef
  • Pathogenesis of bone disorders in HIV infection
    Nils Venhoff, Ulrich Andreas Walker
    International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology.2009; 4(2): 147.     CrossRef
  • Long-term clevudine therapy in nucleos(t)ide-naïve and lamivudine-experienced patients with hepatitis B virus-related chronic liver diseases
    Heon Ju Lee, Jong Ryul Eun, Chang Hyeong Lee, Jae Seok Hwang, Jeong Ill Suh, Byung Seok Kim, Byoung Kuk Jang
    The Korean Journal of Hepatology.2009; 15(2): 179.     CrossRef
  • Adefovir dipivoxil-induced acute tubular necrosis and Fanconi syndrome in a renal transplant patient
    Hassane Izzedine, Rania Kheder-Elfekih, Pierre Housset, Clementine Sarkozy, Isabelle Brocheriou, Gilbert Deray
    AIDS.2009; 23(4): 544.     CrossRef
  • 6,628 View
  • 70 Download
  • Crossref

Hepatology Elsewhere

Background/Aims
In lamivudine-resistant patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), we compared efficacy, predictive response factors and changes in viral mutants in two antiviral approaches with adefovir. Methods: A prospective cohort study on therapy with adefovir alone (29 patients) or combined with ongoing lamivudine (23 patients) was performed. Results: A virological response was achieved in 55% of patients treated with adefovir and in 83% of those treated with the combination (p>0.05). This response was directly related to the basal viral load (p<0.0001) and obtained in 10 patients with basal HBV-DNA<17,200 IU/ml using both strategies. In patients with a higher basal viral load, the virological response was more frequent when treated with the combination (p<0.05). Mutation at locus rt181 predicted HBV-DNA persistence during therapy. A virological rebound was observed in 18% of non-responders while on adefovir monotherapy. Conclusions: To achieve a complete virological response and reduce the risk of adefovir-resistant mutants in lamivudine- resistant patients, rescue therapy is preferable at early evidence of genotypic resistance. However, in subjects with a significant viral load, combination therapy is more effective. The presence of the rt181 mutation is associated with incomplete response.
  • 4,640 View
  • 20 Download

Original Articles

Factors affecting initial virologic response and emergence of resistant mutants after adefovir treatment in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
Jin Hee Cho, M.D., Jae Youn Cheong, M.D., Joon Koo Kang, M.D., Jin Sun Park, M.D., Myoung Hee Lee, M.D., Nam Kyu Lim, M.D., Sun Pyo Hong.1, Soo-Ok Kim.1, Wang Don Yoo.1, and Sung Won Cho, M.D.
Korean J Hepatol 2008;14(1):58-66.
Published online March 20, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2008.14.1.58
Background/Aims
Adefovir dipivoxil (adefovir) effectively inhibits both wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. The development of adefovir resistance is both delayed and infrequent compared with lamivudine resistance. The aim of this study was to characterize the serologic, biochemical, and virologic response to adefovir, and to explore the factors affecting initial virologic response (IVR, defined as a decrease in serum HBV below 4 log10copies/mL after 6 month of treatment) and adefovir resistance in lamivudine resistant HBV-infected patients. Methods: This study population comprised 76 patients with lamivudine-resistance who had received adefovir for more than 12 months between March 2004 and December 2006. The adefovir-resistant mutant was assayed at 6 months and 12 months during adefovir administration. Restriction- fragment mass polymorphism analysis was used for detecting YMDD and adefovir mutants. Results: After adefovir administration, an IVR was observed in 31% of the patients with lamivudine resistance. Factors associated with an IVR were HBeAg negativity (P=0.04) and the presence of liver cirrhosis (P=0.04). Age, sex, pretreatment levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, pretreatment HBV DNA levels, presence of precore mutation, and type of YMDD mutants were not related to an IVR during adefovir treatment. The prevalence of adefovir resistance was 5% and 13% at 6 months and 12 months after therapy, respectively. Mixed infection of the precore mutant was a risk factors for the emergence of adefovir resistance (P=0.01). Conclusions: Lamivudine-resistant HBV patients exhibiting HBeAg negativity and liver cirrhosis were more likely to achieve an IVR after adefovir therapy. Adefovir resistance was associated with mixed infection of the precore mutant. (Korean J Hepatol 2008;14:58-66)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Hepatitis B core antigen expression pattern predicts response to lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Kyeh Dong Shi, Seong Gyu Hwang, Ju Hyun Choi, Il Joon Hwang, Jai Ho Yoon, Kwang Il Kim, Chang-Il Kwon, Sung Pyo Hong, Pil Won Park, Kyu Sung Rim
    The Korean Journal of Hepatology.2008; 14(2): 197.     CrossRef
  • 5,532 View
  • 22 Download
  • Crossref
Effect of Initial Virologic Response to Adefovir on the Development of Resistance to Adefovir in Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
In Hee Kim , Seong Hun Kim , Hyun Chul Kim , Kyoung Deok Shin , Sang Wook Kim , Seong Ok Lee , Soo Teik Lee , Dae Ghon Kim
Korean J Hepatol 2007;13(3):349-362.
Published online September 20, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2007.13.3.349
Background/Aims: Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) resistance in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B is not well understood. This study examined the initial virologic response (IVR) to ADV, the rate of ADV resistance and the factors associated with ADV resistance. Methods: Eighty one lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-positive patients were enrolled in this study. IVR was defined as HBV DNA < 4 log10 copies/mL after 6 months of therapy. Results: IVR was observed in 37/81(45.7%) patients and it was associated with higher pretreatment ALT (P=0.002), and low pretreatment HBV DNA level (P=0.015). The HBV DNA levels were significantly higher in the non-IVR patients than the IVR patients at 12, 18 and 24 months (4.73 vs 2.59, 4.53 vs 2.31, 4.39 vs 2.40 log10 copies/mL, respectively; P<0.01). During the follow-up period, 17(21.0%) patients showed phenotypic resistance to ADV and 9 (11.1%) patients had ADV-resistant mutations. The cumulative probabilities of the phenotypic resistance to ADV at 12 and 24 months were 8.7% and 32.5%, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of the genotypic resistance to ADV at 12 and 24 months were 0% and 14.6%, respectively. Resistance to ADV was associated with a higher pretreatment HBV DNA (P=0.019), and non-IVR (P<0.001). Conclusions: The cumulative probabilities of the phenotypic and genotypic resistance to ADV at 24 months were 32.5% and 14.6%. The high pretreatment HBV DNA and non-IVR (HBV DNA ≥ 4 log10 copies/mL after 6 months of therapy) were associated with ADV resistance. (Korean J Hepatol 2007;13: 349-362)

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Initial Virological Response and Viral Mutation with Adefovir Dipivoxil Added to Ongoing Lamivudine Therapy in Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
    Shuang Wu, Kenichi Fukai, Fumio Imazeki, Makoto Arai, Tatsuo Kanda, Yutaka Yonemitsu, Osamu Yokosuka
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2011; 56(4): 1207.     CrossRef
  • 5,178 View
  • 18 Download
  • Crossref

Reviews

Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B ; Dose and Treatment Duration of Regimen
Young Oh Kweon
Korean J Hepatol 2005;11(1):13-16.
  • 3,414 View
  • 13 Download

Original Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Adefovir Dipivoxil in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis with Lamivudine Resistance Compared to Patients with Compensated Liver Disease
Won Moon, M.D., Moon Seok Choi, M.D., Yu Mi Moon, R.N., Seung Woon Paik, M.D., Joon Hyoek Lee, M.D., Kwang Cheol Koh, M.D., Byung Chul Yoo, M.D., Jong Chul Rhee, M.D. and Sang Goon Shim, M.D.1
Korean J Hepatol 2005;11(2):125-134.
Background/Aims
Adefovir dipivoxil is effective in patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, little is known about its role in Korean patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis with lamivudine resistance, and we compared this to the patients having compensated liver disease.
Methods
The patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic liver disease were enrolled and they received adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg daily. The clinical course and the biochemical and virological response of the decompensated cirrhosis group were compared with those of the patients with compensated liver disease group. Results: One-hundred and one patients (the decompensated cirrhosis group, n=53; the compensated liver disease group, n=48) were evaluated. During the following up, 13 patients in the decompensated group and 4 patients in the compensated group dropped out of the treatment (P=0.011). After adefovir treatment, the proportion of patients with serum HBV DNA below 0.5 pg/mL in the decompensated group was less than that in the compensated group (50.9% vs. 83.3%, P=0.001), but the rates of normalized ALT, HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion did not differ. The change of the Child-Pugh score in the decompensated group was 9.1±1.8 to 6.9±1.6 (P<0.001). The biochemical response in decompensated group was slower than that in the compensated group. Renal toxicity was not observed in either group. Conclusions: These results suggest that adefovir dipivoxil would be an effective and safe treatment for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis with lamivudine resistance, but its effect might be limited and slower for decompensated cirrhosis. (Korean J Hepatol 2005;11:125-134)
  • 3,015 View
  • 17 Download
Clinical Outcomes after Discontinuation of Lamivudine in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Lamivudine Resistant HBV Mutant
Jeong Ki Kim, M.D.1, Seong Gyu Hwang, M.D.1,2, Hyeuk Park, M.D.1, Hong Youp Choi, M.D.1, Hyo Jin Cho, B.S.2, Kwang Hyun Ko, M.D.1, Sung Pyo Hong, M.D.1, Pil Won Park, M.D.1, Nam Keun Kim, Ph.D.2, and Kyu Sung Rim, M.D.1,2
Korean J Hepatol 2005;11(3):227-242.
Background/Aims
The therapeutic strategies of applying adefovir for treating lamivudine resistant HBV mutants are controversial. Thus, we observed the clinical outcomes after discontinuation of lamivudine to establish the timing to initiate adefovir therapy. Methods: Fifty chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with lamivudine resistant HBV mutants who had received lamivudine for more than 12 months were included in the study. We investigated the clinical outcomes at 6 months after the end of treatment (EOT). We compared the serial clinical outcomes among respective groups based on serum ALT at the EOT and the clinical characteristics of patients with or without acute exacerbation (AE) and the HBeAg loss. We also investigated the predictive parameters of AE and HBeAg loss. Results: Fifteen patients (30%) had experienced AE at 6 months after the EOT. Four patients received antiviral agents because of their hepatic decompensation. Patients with AE had higher serum ALT values and lower HBV DNA titers at EOT compared with those patients without AE. Serum ALT at the EOT was the predictive parameter of AE. Eight patients (21.6%) had newly developed HBeAg loss at 6 months after EOT. The total bilirubin at EOT was the predictive parameter of HBeAg loss. Conclusions: CHB patients with lamivudine resistant HBV mutants had favorable clinical outcomes at 6 months after EOT. Therefore, we can consider observing the clinical courses after discontinuation of lamivudine and it is not always required to overlap the adefovir for treating lamivudine resistant HBV mutants except for the treatment of patients with a high risk of developing decompensation. (Korean J Hepatol 2005;11:227-242)
  • 3,853 View
  • 14 Download
Review
Resistance to Adefovir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B
Soo Hyung Ryu, M.D.,* Young-Hwa Chung, M.D.
Korean J Hepatol 2006;12(4):484-492.
Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis patients with wild type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus. The occurrence of viral resistance to long-term adefovir therapy is rare, the cumulative rates of resistance were 0%, 3%, 11%, 18%, and 28% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of therapy, respectively. The emergence of adefovir resistant mutant in patients with lamivudine resistance is more common than in treatment-naive patients. Two major mutations of adefovir resistance are rtN236T and rtA181V/T. Other mutations in the HBV polymerase (rtP237H, rtN238T/D, rtV84M, rtS85A, rtV214A, rtQ215S) reduce sensitivity to adefovir, but the significance of these mutations is unclear. The adefovir mutations slightly decrease adefovir susceptibility in vitro, suggesting mild clinical course after the occurrence of adefovir resistance. However, some patients show viral rebound and hepatic decompensation. Lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir are used currently for salvage therapy in patients with adefovir resistance. To reduce adefovir resistance, combination therapy with adefovir and lamivudine in patients with lamivudine resistance may be a treatment option. (Korean J Hepatol 2006;12:484-492)
  • 3,694 View
  • 27 Download