Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Clin Mol Hepatol : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Advanced fibrosis"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Advanced fibrosis"

Letter to the Editor

Steatotic liver disease

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Integrated serum metabolomics and MRI biomarkers for MASLD: a practical framework for noninvasive staging and monitoring
    Hamzah M. Alghzawi, Sweta Sahu, Aditya Rana, Rhobi Mwita, Sri Gundapaneni, Dushyant Dahiya
    Abdominal Radiology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,403 View
  • 100 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Correspondence

Original Articles

Steatotic liver disease

Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Young Eun Chon, Young-Joo Jin, Jihyun An, Hee Yeon Kim, Miyoung Choi, Dae Won Jun, Mi Na Kim, Ji Won Han, Han Ah Lee, Jung Hwan Yu, Seung Up Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30(Suppl):S117-S133.
Published online August 21, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0392
Background/aims
Opinions differ regarding vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (VCTE/MRE) cut-offs for diagnosing advanced fibrosis (AF) in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We investigated the diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off values of VCTE and MRE for diagnosing AF.
Methods
Literature databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed, were used to identify relevant studies published up to June 13, 2023. We selected studies evaluating VCTE and MRE regarding the degree of liver fibrosis using liver biopsy as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs) of the pooled data for VCTE and MRE for each fibrosis stage and optimal cut-offs for AF were investigated.
Results
A total of 19,199 patients from 63 studies using VCTE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.80–0.86), 0.83 (0.80–0.86), 0.87 (0.84–0.90), and 0.94 (0.91–0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. Similarly, 1,484 patients from 14 studies using MRE showed diagnostic AUC of 0.89 (0.86–0.92), 0.92 (0.89–0.94), 0.89 (0.86–0.92), and 0.94 (0.91–0.96) for ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages, respectively. The diagnostic AUC for AF using VCTE was highest at 0.90 with a cut-off of 7.1–7.9 kPa, and that of MRE was highest at 0.94 with a cut-off of 3.62–3.8 kPa.
Conclusions
VCTE (7.1–7.9 kPa) and MRE (3.62–3.8 kPa) with the suggested cut-offs showed favorable accuracy for diagnosing AF in patients with NAFLD. This result will serve as a basis for clinical guidelines for non-invasive tests and differential diagnosis of AF.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Even Lower Alcohol Intake Might Be Harmful for East Asian Males With MASLD Spectrum
    Byungyoon Yun, Juyeon Oh, Heejoo Park, Jian Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Jin-Ha Yoon
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026; 24(6): 1644.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Risk-based Surveillance Strategy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease
    Ji Won Han
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2026; 86(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Liver fibrosis biomarkers as a prognostic tool beyond the defining components in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome
    Zhenyang Cao, Binyan Chen, Jinghao Zhou, Jijie Jin, Dmitry Abramov, Shengzhang Chen, Pan Huang, Jianghua Zhou
    American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.2026; 26: 101438.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Value of MR Elastography and MRI‐Proton Density Fat Fraction in Cirrhosis Based on Explant Liver Histology
    Eun‐Ki Min, Seung‐seob Kim, Byungsoo Ahn, Deok‐Gie Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Sang Hoon Ahn, Seung Up Kim, Jae Geun Lee
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026; 41(4): 1323.     CrossRef
  • Risk Stratification of Chronic Kidney Disease in Adults Using Noninvasive Fibrosis Tests Based on the American Diabetes Association Algorithm
    Chan‐Young Jung, Hye Won Lee, Jung Il Lee, Han Ah Lee, Seung Up Kim
    Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism.2026; 28(6): 5240.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease: mechanisms, diagnosis, and management in adults
    Tina Reinson, Josh Bilson, Caroline Childs, Ryan M Buchanan, Giovanni Targher, Christopher D Byrne
    BMJ Medicine.2026; 5(1): e002038.     CrossRef
  • Electroacupuncture in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential
    Yi Wang, Lai Zhang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Obesity: Pathogenesis, Diagnostics, Risk Stratification, and Therapeutic Approach
    Beom Kyung Kim
    The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Liver Fibrosis: Molecular Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Interventions
    Jiaorong Qu, Wenqing Qin, Minghang Dong, Zhi Ma, Si Li, Runping Liu, Ranyun Chen, Changmeng Li, Xiaojiaoyang Li
    MedComm.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evolving B-mode ultrasound-based techniques for assessing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Now and beyond
    Walaa Abdelhamed, Mohamed Elbadry, Mohamed El-Kassas
    Liver Research.2026; 10(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Gravitational 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma
    Leon David Gruenewald, Shayan Mansouri, Christian Booz, Jennifer Gotta, Philipp Reschke, Tommaso D’Angelo, Mohamed Alrahmoun, Scherwin Mahmoudi, Simon S. Martin, Katrin Eichler, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Stefan Zeuzem, Esra Görgülü, Melis Onay, Eva Herrmann, M
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(10): 1569.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): Clinical Profile, Phenotypes, and Risk Stratification. A Narrative Review
    Zalina Yuryevna Sozaeva, Marina Vsevolodovna Atayeva, Elizaveta Olegovna Salatova, Irina Kazbekovna Alikova, Alexandra Evgenievna Dolgaya, Amin Gasaevich Magomedov, Kamilla Ramisovna Hafsi, Nur-Mukhamed Aslanovich Shomakhov, Elena Mukhadinovna Pshukova, Y
    Journal of Biochemical Technology.2026; 17(2): 30.     CrossRef
  • Integrative and interpretable machine learning framework for early non-invasive detection of clinically significant liver fibrosis
    Dong Cao, Junjie Wang, Chenxi Hou, Jingyu Zeng, Baiyue Tian, Yuan Liu, Xing Luo, Jiaxin Tian, Mingbo Zhou, Pan Li, Huilong Fang, Ze Liu, Zheng Gong
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rule-Out Cutoff of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Significant Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and External Validation
    Joo Hyun Oh, Jonghyun Lee, Miyoung Choi, Kento Imajo, Masato Yoneda, Hideki Fujii, Hyo Young Lee, Eileen L. Yoon, Mimi Kim, Dae Won Jun
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026; 24(9): 2387.     CrossRef
  • Screening for Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Evidence, Challenges, and the Role of Imaging—From the AJR Special Series on Screening
    Shin Mei Chan, Cheng William Hong, Lael Ceriani, Manish Dhyani, Kathryn J. Fowler, Michael S. Middleton, Theodore T. Pierce, Perry J. Pickhardt, Scott B. Reeder, Anthony E. Samir, Adam Searleman, Dorathy Tamayo-Murillo, Claude B. Sirlin
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of HCC in Elderly Patients With MASLD: Proposal of an Effective Surveillance Strategy
    Young Eun Chon, Kyung‐Do Han, Ju Dong Yang, Ju‐Yeong Park, Hyun‐Seok Kim, Hyung Woong Lee, Tae Seop Lim, Beom Kyung Kim
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The utility of emerging fibrosis scoring systems in MASLD: A paradigm shift toward non-invasive, multimodal risk stratification beyond histology
    Thomas Karlas, Eva Katharina Messer, Johannes Wiegand
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Use of Ultrasound-Based Elastography Techniques in Liver Fibrosis: A Narrative Review
    Arjuna Priyadarsin De Silva, Shashini Madushika Hathurusinghe, Madunil Anuk Niriella, Hithunadura Janaka De Silva
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(17): 2694.     CrossRef
  • Correspondence to editorial on “Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analy
    Young Eun Chon, Jung Hwan Yu, Seung Up Kim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(1): e61.     CrossRef
  • Essential tools for assessing advanced fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Editorial on “Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fib
    Won Sohn
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(1): 277.     CrossRef
  • Correspondence to editorial on “Optimal cutoffs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analys
    Jung Hwan Yu, Seung Up Kim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(1): e52.     CrossRef
  • Towards unification of liver stiffness measurement cutoffs: Editorial on “Optimal cut-offs of vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography in diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver d
    Yangyue Zhang, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2025; 31(1): 264.     CrossRef
  • Sustainability of General Population Screening for Steatotic Liver Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    Laura De Rosa, Gabriele Ricco, Maurizia Rossana Brunetto, Ferruccio Bonino, Francesco Faita
    Healthcare.2025; 13(7): 759.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Efficacy of Silymarin, Vitamin E, and Essential Phospholipid Combination Therapy on Hepatic Steatosis, Fibrosis, and Metabolic Parameters in MASLD Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study
    Dan-Ionuț Gheonea, Cristina Tocia, Victor-Mihai Sacerdoțianu, Alexandra-Georgiana Bocioagă, Irina-Paula Doica, Nicolae Cătălin Manea, Adina Turcu-Știolică, Carmen-Nicoleta Oancea, Eugen Dumitru
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(12): 5427.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning radiomics of elastography for diagnosing compensated advanced chronic liver disease: an international multicenter study
    Xue Lu, Haoyan Zhang, Hidekatsu Kuroda, Matteo Garcovich, Victor de Ledinghen, Ivica Grgurević, Runze Linghu, Hong Ding, Jiandong Chang, Min Wu, Cheng Feng, Xinping Ren, Changzhu Liu, Tao Song, Fankun Meng, Yao Zhang, Ye Fang, Sumei Ma, Jinfen Wang, Xiaol
    Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Liver disease in people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA): A cross-sectional study using magnetic resonance elastography
    Ernesto Maddaloni, Marta Zerunian, Vincenzo Cardinale, Annalisa Zurru, Rocco Amendolara, Daniela Luverà, Renata Risi, Luca D’Onofrio, Benedetta Masci, Francesco Covotta, Damiano Caruso, Domenico Alvaro, Andrea Laghi, Raffaella Buzzetti
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2025; 229: 112465.     CrossRef
  • Paired snRNA-seq and scRNA-seq analysis of MASLD patients to identify early-stage markers for disease progression
    Suebin Park, Su-Hyeon Lee, Se-eun Han, Beom Kyung Kim, Byungjin Hwang
    Hepatology Communications.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lean Metabolic Dysfunction‐Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
    Xixi Fang, Chenhao Xu, Jun Lu, Runzhou Zhuang, Xiao Xu, Xuyong Wei
    Cell Biochemistry and Function.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mistakes in the utilization of vibration-controlled transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis: a narrative review
    Madunil Anuk Niriella, Uditha Bandara Dassanayake, Charith Priyanga Madurapperuma, Indeewari Prathibha Wijesingha, Arjuna Priyadarshin De Silva, Hithnadura Janaka de Silva
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 19(12): 1299.     CrossRef
  • Transient Elastography and Fibroscan: Stethoscope of a Hepatologist in Today’s World
    Sajid Jalil, Mangesh Pagadala, Nicholas Dunn, Hanna Blaney, Mohamed Elfeki, Nimish Thakral, Ashwani K. Singal
    Current Hepatology Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of non-invasive fibrosis markers: Insights from chronic HBV, HBV+HDV, and HCV infections
    Aziza Saydullaevna Khikmatullaeva, Krestina Stepanovna Brigida, Nargiza Mirzakhidovna Мirrakhimova, Muazzam Alievna Аbdukadirova, Nargiz Sapievna Ibadullaeva, Allabergan Kadirovich Bayjanov, Nataliya Georgiyevna Kan, Malika Erkinovna Khodjaeva, Nargiza An
    Infectious Medicine.2025; 4(4): 100220.     CrossRef
  • 13,590 View
  • 269 Download
  • 32 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Viral hepatitis

Advanced fibrosis is not a negative pretreatment predictive factor for genotype 2 or 3 chronic hepatitis C patients
Hyun Seok Lee, Young Oh Kweon, Won Young Tak, Soo Young Park, Eun Jung Kang, Yu Lim Lee, Hae Min Yang, Hyun Woo Park
Clin Mol Hepatol 2013;19(2):148-155.
Published online June 27, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2013.19.2.148
Background/Aims

Chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis have unsatisfactory sustained virological response (SVR) rates. Few data demonstrating the efficacy of combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis in South Korea are available. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the stage of fibrosis impacts the efficacy of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data for a total of 109 patients with chronic hepatitis C, treated with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin. SVR according to the stage of liver fibrosis assessed by pretreatment liver biopsy and genotype results were analyzed.

Results

Data from 66 genotype 1 patients (60.6%) and 43 genotype 2 or 3 patients (39.4%) among the 109 patients were analyzed. SVR rates for the genotype 1 patients were significantly lower for the stage 3-4 group (32.1%) than the stage 0-2 group (78.9%; P<0.001). SVR rates (92.0% for stage 0-2, 77.8% for stage 3-4, P=0.184) of genotype 2 or 3 patients were not significantly different according to fibrosis stage. Likewise, the frequency of adverse events was not significantly different according to fibrosis stage.

Conclusions

Compared to patients without advanced fibrosis, we can anticipate good SVR rates for genotype 2 or 3 patients with advanced fibrosis and they did not show an inferior tolerability for peginterferon and ribavirin combination therpy. Our results suggest that active treatment is needed for genotype 2 or 3 patients with advanced fibrosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Thrombocytopenia in Virus Infections
    Matthijs Raadsen, Justin Du Toit, Thomas Langerak, Bas van Bussel, Eric van Gorp, Marco Goeijenbier
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(4): 877.     CrossRef
  • Real-world single-center experience with direct-acting antivirals for improvement of the liver fibrosis after chronic hepatitis C treatment
    Sun Hee Lee, Hyun Phil Shin, Joung Il Lee
    Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy.2020; 28: 204020662097483.     CrossRef
  • Hepatitis C in infection with recombinant strain RF2k/1b of the virus: clinical course and therapy
    L. I Nikolaeva, G. V Sapronov, A. V Kolotvin, E. I Samokhvalov, E. A Leybman, L. M Samokhodskaya
    Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases.2014; 19(3): 9.     CrossRef
  • 10,897 View
  • 33 Download
  • Crossref