The advent of novel, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens for hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection has revolutionized its treatment by producing a sustained virologic response of more than 95% with few side effects and no comorbidities in the general population. Until recently, ideal DAA regimens have not been available to patients with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease because there are limited data on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of treatment in this unique population. In a hemodialysis context, identifying patients in need of treatment and preventing HCV transmission may also be a matter of concern. Recently published studies suggest that a combination of paritaprevir/ ritonavir/ombitasvir and dasabuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, or glecaprevir/pibrentasir successfully treats HCV infection in chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 patients with or without hemodialysis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The remaining challenges of HCV treatment in the direct‐acting antivirals era Beom Kyung Kim, Sang Hoon Ahn Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(11): 1891. CrossRef
Backgrounds/Aims : To investigate the prevalence and clinical implications of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in patients with chronic renal failure, a cross-sectional study of 131 hemodialysis patients and 33 kidney transplantation recipients was conducted. Methods : HGV RNA was amplified by reverse-transcription (RT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with primers from the 5'-untranslated region of the viral genome. Results : The prevalence of HGV infection in patients with chronic renal failure was 25%(41/164). The following factors were taken into consideration: the mean age(43.15±11.97 years vs 46.46±13.08 years), the male to female ratio(2.15:1 vs 1.86:1), the mean of the dialysis duration(4.58±3.18 years vs 3.90±3.31 years), transfusion history (75.6% vs 62.6%), the mean of the ALT level during the prior 6 months(25.78±21.50 IU/L vs 23.00±59.49 IU/L), and the amount of transfusion(6.22±8.03 units vs 5.74±9.44 units). The anti-HCV(4.88% vs 8.94%) showed no difference between HGV RNA positive and negative group. The HBsAg positive ratio was 19.5% and 5.81% in HGV RNA positive group and negative group, respectively. Conclusion : The prevalence of HGV infection in patients with chronic renal failure was 25%. There was a higher rate of HBsAg positivity in the HGV RNA positive group rather than in the negative group. HGV infection did not seem to be associated with clinically significant hepatitis.(Korean J Hepatol 2000;6:82-90)