Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CMH : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

4
results for

"Lamivudine resistance"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Lamivudine resistance"

Editorial

Viral hepatitis

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Desmethylphosphinothricin Dipeptide Derivative Effectively Inhibits Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis Growth
    Maxim A. Khomutov, Fabio Giovannercole, Laura Onillon, Marija V. Demiankova, Byazilya F. Vasilieva, Arthur I. Salikhov, Sergey N. Kochetkov, Olga V. Efremenkova, Alex R. Khomutov, Daniela De Biase
    Biomolecules.2023; 13(10): 1451.     CrossRef
  • 10,679 View
  • 113 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Original Article

Viral hepatitis

Background/Aims

We compared the efficacies of entecavir (ETV) plus tenofovir (TDF) and ETV plus adefovir (ADV) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with genotypic resistance to lamivudine (LAM) who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy.

Methods

We reviewed 63 CHB patients with genotypic resistance to LAM who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy. Among these patients, 30 were treated with ETV + ADV and 33 were treated with ETV + TDF for 12 months.

Results

The only baseline characteristic that differed significantly between the two groups was the ETV resistance profile. The rate of a virologic response [serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of <20 IU/mL] was significant higher for ETV+TDF than for ETV+ADV over 12 months (57.6% vs. 23.3%, P=0.006, at 6 months; 84.8% vs. 26.7%, P<0.001, at 12 months). The probability of a virologic response was significantly increased in ETV+TDF (P<0.001, OR=54.78, 95% CI=7.15-419.54) and decreased in patients with higher baseline viral loads (P=0.001, OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.07-0.50) in multivariate analysis. No serious adverse event occurred during the study period.

Conclusions

In patients with CHB who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy, ETV+TDF was superior to ETV+ADV in achieving a virologic response regardless of the HBV resistance profile. Further large-scale and long-term follow-up prospective studies are needed to explain these results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Tenofovir plus entecavir combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogue failure
    Bengü TATAR, Şükran KÖSE
    The European Research Journal.2020; 6(4): 270.     CrossRef
  • Entecavir+tenofovir vs. lamivudine/telbivudine+adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with prior suboptimal response
    Hyun Young Woo, Jun Yong Park, Si Hyun Bae, Chang Wook Kim, Jae Young Jang, Won Young Tak, Dong Joon Kim, In Hee Kim, Jeong Heo, Sang Hoon Ahn
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2020; 26(3): 352.     CrossRef
  • Is the tenofovir based therapy almighty for previous treatment failure in chronic hepatitis B?
    Hyung Joon Yim
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2016; 22(2): 238.     CrossRef
  • Biological Antivirals for Treatment of Adenovirus Infections
    Katrin Schaar, Carsten Röger, Tanja Pozzuto, Jens Kurreck, Sandra Pinkert, Henry Fechner
    Antiviral Therapy.2016; 21(7): 559.     CrossRef
  • 11,728 View
  • 89 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • Crossref

Hepatology Elsewhere

The Korean Journal of Entecavir 1 mg therapy for Lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B
Hyung Joon Kim
Korean J Hepatol 2008;14(3):411-416.
Published online September 30, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/kjhep.2008.14.3.411
  • 5,409 View
  • 23 Download
Original Article
Clinical and Virologic Characteristics of Lamivudine Resistance in HBV-associated Chronic Liver Disease
Sun Suk Kim, M.D., Moon Gi Chung, M.D., Ki Tak Ju, M.D., Dong Kyun Park, M.D. Oh Sang Kwon, M.D.,Yang Suh Koo, M.D., Yu Kyung Kim, M.D., Duck Ju Choi, M.D. Yu Jin Hwang, Ph.D.* and Ju Hyun Kim, M.D.
Korean J Hepatol 2002;8(4):405-417.
Background/Aims
Lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B has been shown to be effective in inhibiting HBV replication. However, lamivudine resistance has been developed with prolonged use. We studied to etermine the prevalence, predictive factors, and clinical outcomes of lamivudine resistance. Mutations in YMDD motif of HBV polymerase, which have been associated with lamivudine resistance, were also assessed. Methods: 170 patients with HBV-associated chronic liver disease who have received lamivudine for at least one year, were studied. The clinical, biochemical, and virologic characteristics were analyzed and compared according to presence (resistance group) or absence (non-resistance group) of DNA breakthrough. Their clinical outcomes were regularly followed. Stored sera before treatment and after DNA breakthrough were examined for detection of HBV polymerase mutation by direct sequencing and/or RFLP. Results: Cumulative rates of lamivudine resistance after one and two years of treatment were 11% and 34%, respectively. In the resistance group, as compared to the non-resistance group, age, the presence of HBeAg before treatment, and disappearance of HBeAg during treatment, were significantly different. The predictive factors associated with lamivudine resistance were not found. ALT and HBV-DNA level after lamivudine resistance was variable, but jaundice or hepatic failure was absent. Mutation in YMDD motif was detected in 73% and other variable mutations were detected before treatment and after DNA breakthrough. Conclusions: Lamivudine resistance increases the longer the duration of treatment and clinical outcomes are variable. The mutation in YMDD motif was found in about 2/3 of cases. Other causes for lamivudine resistance may be considered. (Korean J Hepatol 2002;8:405-417)
  • 3,045 View
  • 16 Download