Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Clin Mol Hepatol : Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"Non-selective beta blocker"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

"Non-selective beta blocker"

Original Article

Liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension

Effects of candesartan and propranolol combination therapy versus propranolol monotherapy in reducing portal hypertension
Jae Hyun Kim, Jung Min Kim, Youn Zoo Cho, Ji Hoon Na, Hyun Sik Kim, Hyoun A Kim, Hye Won Kang, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Seung Hwan Cha, Young Ju Kim, Moon Young Kim
Clin Mol Hepatol 2014;20(4):376-383.
Published online December 24, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2014.20.4.376
Background/Aims

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit activated hepatic stellate cell contraction and are thought to reduce the dynamic portion of intrahepatic resistance. This study compared the effects of combined treatment using the ARB candesartan and propranolol versus propranolol monotherapy on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Between January 2008 and July 2009, 53 cirrhotic patients with clinically significant portal hypertension were randomized to receive either candesartan and propranolol combination therapy (26 patients) or propranolol monotherapy (27 patients). Before and 3 months after the administration of the planned medication, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was assessed in both groups. The dose of propranolol was subsequently increased from 20 mg bid until the target heart rate was reached, and the candesartan dose was fixed at 8 mg qd. The primary endpoint was the HVPG response rate; patients with an HVPG reduction of >20% of the baseline value or to <12 mmHg were defined as responders.

Results

The mean portal pressure declined significantly in both groups, from 16 mmHg (range, 12-28 mmHg) to 13.5 mmHg (range, 6-20 mmHg) in the combination group (P<0.05), and from 17 mmHg (range, 12-27 mmHg) to 14 mmHg (range, 7-25 mmHg) in the propranolol monotherapy group (P<0.05). However, the medication-induced pressure reduction did not differ significantly between the two groups [3.5 mmHg (range, -3-11 mmHg) vs. 3 mmHg (range, -8-10 mmHg), P=0.674]. The response rate (55.6% vs. 61.5%, P=0.435) and the reductions in mean blood pressure or heart rate also did not differ significantly between the combination and monotherapy groups.

Conclusions

The addition of candesartan (an ARB) to propranolol confers no benefit relative to classical propranolol monotherapy for the treatment of portal hypertension, and is thus not recommended.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • From Pathophysiology to Practice: Evolving Pharmacological Therapies, Clinical Complications, and Pharmacogenetic Considerations in Portal Hypertension
    Michał Porada, Łukasz Bułdak
    Metabolites.2025; 15(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future Directions in the Pharmacologic Management of Cirrhosis
    Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul, K. Rajender Reddy
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2025; 29(4): 657.     CrossRef
  • The Renin–Angiotensin System in Liver Disease
    Mary S. McGrath, Brian J. Wentworth
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(11): 5807.     CrossRef
  • Autoregulation: mediators and renin–angiotensin system in diseases and treatments
    Antony Sameh Mansour
    Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The longitudinal outcomes of applying non-selective beta-blockers in portal hypertension: real-world multicenter study
    Seong Hee Kang, Minjong Lee, Moon Young Kim, Jun Hyeok Lee, Baek Gyu Jun, Tae Suk Kim, Dae Hee Choi, Ki Tae Suk, Young Don Kim, Gab Jin Cheon, Dong Joon Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2021; 15(2): 424.     CrossRef
  • Pathways of hepatic and renal damage through non‐classical activation of the renin‐angiotensin system in chronic liver disease
    Giovanni Sansoè, Manuela Aragno, Florence Wong
    Liver International.2020; 40(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Portal Hypertension and Related Complications: Diagnosis and Management
    Douglas A. Simonetto, Mengfei Liu, Patrick S. Kamath
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings.2019; 94(4): 714.     CrossRef
  • Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Disease: An Update on Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities
    Paul Manka, Amos Zeller, Wing-Kin Syn
    Drugs.2019; 79(9): 903.     CrossRef
  • Pharmacologic Management of Portal Hypertension
    Chalermrat Bunchorntavakul, K. Rajender Reddy
    Clinics in Liver Disease.2019; 23(4): 713.     CrossRef
  • Novelties in the pathophysiology and management of portal hypertension: new treatments on the horizon
    Seong Hee Kang, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2018; 12(S1): 112.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin II receptor blockers for the treatment of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huijing Yao, Chunqing Zhang
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).2018; 187(4): 925.     CrossRef
  • Role of the renin-angiotensin system in hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension
    Kwang Yong Shim, Young Woo Eom, Moon Young Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Soon Koo Baik
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2018; 33(3): 453.     CrossRef
  • Impact of sarcopenia on prognostic value of cirrhosis: going beyond the hepatic venous pressure gradient and MELD score
    Seong Hee Kang, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Soon Koo Baik, Seung Hwan Cha, Moon Young Kim
    Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.2018; 9(5): 860.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Hepatic Vein Arrival Time Performed with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaeun Kim, Kwang Yong Shim, Soon Koo Baik
    Gut and Liver.2017; 11(1): 93.     CrossRef
  • Decreased potency of fimasartan in liver cirrhosis was quantified using mixed-effects analysis
    Choon OK Kim, Sangil Jeon, Seunghoon Han, Taegon Hong, Min Soo Park, Young-Ran Yoon, Dong-Seok Yim
    Translational and Clinical Pharmacology.2017; 25(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Novel treatment options for portal hypertension
    Philipp Schwabl, Wim Laleman
    Gastroenterology Report.2017; 5(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Rifaximin and Propranolol Combination Therapy Is More Effective than Propranolol Monotherapy for the Reduction of Portal Pressure: An Open Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Yoo Li Lim, Moon Young Kim, Yoon Ok Jang, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon
    Gut and Liver.2017; 11(5): 702.     CrossRef
  • Renin–angiotensin system inhibitors and fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a systematic review
    Gaeun Kim, Juyoung Kim, Yoo Li Lim, Moon Young Kim, Soon Koo Baik
    Hepatology International.2016; 10(5): 819.     CrossRef
  • Emerging therapies for portal hypertension in cirrhosis
    Harikumar Nair, Annalisa Berzigotti, Jaime Bosch
    Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs.2016; 21(2): 167.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin receptor blocker add-on therapy in portal hypertension: To use angiotensin receptor blocker or not to use, that is the question
    Hyun Woong Lee
    Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.2014; 20(4): 345.     CrossRef
  • 13,288 View
  • 84 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • Crossref