Diagnostic accuracy of the Fibrosis-4 index for advanced liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
Ji Won Han1,2, Hee Yeon Kim1,3, Jung Hwan Yu4, Mi Na Kim5, Young Eun Chon6, Ji Hyun An7, Young-Joo Jin4, Miyoung Choi8, Seung Up Kim4, Han Ah Lee9, Dae Won Jun10 |
1The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Korea 2Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic Korea 3Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic Korea 4Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic Korea 5Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic Korea 6Department of Gastroenterology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic Korea 7Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Republic Korea 8Clinical Evidence Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Republic Korea 9Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic Korea 10Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic Korea |
|
Received: May 4, 2024 Revised: July 23, 2024 Accepted: July 23, 2024 *Ji Won Han and Hee Yeon Kim contributed equally to this work. |
|
ABSTRACT |
|
Background/Aims The Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is a non-invasive test widely used to rule out advanced liver fibrosis (AF) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). However, its diagnostic accuracy in MASLD patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are controversial due to the high prevalence of AF in this population.
Methods Research focusing on the diagnostic accuracy of FIB-4 for liver fibrosis as validated by liver histology in MASLD patients with T2DM was included, and 12 studies (n=5,624) were finally included in the meta-analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC), positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) at low cutoffs (1.3–1.67) and high cutoffs (2.67–3.25) for ruling in and out AF, were calculated.
Results At low cutoffs, the meta-analysis revealed a sensitivity of 0.74, specificity of 0.62, and HSROC of 0.75. At high cutoffs, the analysis showed a sensitivity of 0.33, specificity of 0.92, and HSROC of 0.85, suggesting FIB-4 as useful for identifying or excluding AF. In subgroup analyses, high mean age and F3 prevalence were associated with lower sensitivity. The calculated NPV and PPV were 0.82 and 0.49 at low cutoffs, whereas the NPV was 0.28 and the PPV was 0.70 at high cutoffs. There were insufficient estimated NPVs <0.90 at a hypothesized prevalence of AF >30% at an FIB-4 cutoff range of 1.3–1.67.
Conclusions Collectively, FIB-4 has moderate diagnostic accuracy for identifying or excluding AF in MASLD patients with T2DM, but more evidence must be accumulated due to the limited number of currently reported studies and their heterogeneity. |
|
|