Reply to correspondence on “Risk assessment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma development using vibration-controlled transient elastography: Systematic review and meta-analysis”

Article information

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2025;31(1):e117-e118
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 November 11
doi : https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0994
1UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London, UK
2University of Verona, Liver Unit, Medicine Department, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy
Corresponding author : Emmanuel A. Tsochatzis UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, Pond Street, NW3 2QG, London NW3 2QG, UK Tel: +44 2077940500, Fax: +44 2074726226, E-mail: e.tsochatzis@ucl.ac.uk
Editor: Han Ah Lee, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Korea
Received 2024 November 5; Accepted 2024 November 7.

Dear Editor,

We would like to extend our appreciation to Jin et al. for their considerate response to our editorial on their systematic review and meta-analysis [1,2].

We appreciate their recognition of the limitations we highlighted regarding the generalizability of their findings and the potential influence of antiviral therapy.

Indeed, their work provides valuable insights into the use of transient elastography (TE) as a non-invasive tool for stratifying the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), particularly in regions with high prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) [3].

Moving forward, we strongly agree with the Authors that multinational studies would be crucial in enhancing the global applicability of their findings. Particularly, including populations from regions with varying HBV epidemiology and different access to antiviral therapies could offer a wider perspective on the role of TE in predicting HCC in different settings [4-8]. Furthermore, considering the different phases of CHB, including prolonged antiviral therapy and the HBeAg status, as part of future studies, could help improve models for risk stratification [1].

Additionally, as we emphasized in our editorial, the relatively low sensitivity of TE suggests that, while it is surely a useful tool [7,9], it will need to be combined with other biomarkers and/or clinical parameters (such as age, platelets count, and HBV-DNA levels), to offer a more accurate risk assessment [1]. Combining TE with other non-invasive tests, such as FIB-4 or APRI, could potentially provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the fibrosis stage and HCC risk, enabling tailored patient management. Therefore, we believe that new prediction models using TE in combination with biomarkers and clinical parameters could help to define the risk of HCC development in this patient population.

In conclusion, we believe that TE, when incorporated in HCC risk prediction models, could have the potential to significantly improve HCC surveillance strategies in CHB patients. We look forward to future research in this area to further advance our understanding and management of HBV-related liver disease.

Notes

Authors’ contribution

Both authors equally contributed to this correspondence, reviewed the content and approved the final version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Abbreviations

CHB

chronic hepatitis B

HBV

hepatitis B virus

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

TE

transient elastography

References

1. Zoncapè M, Tsochatzis EA. The use of transient elastography for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients: Editorial on “Risk assessment of hepatitis B virusrelated hepatocellular carcinoma development using vibrationcontrolled transient elastography: Systematic review and meta-analysis”. Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31:268–274.
2. Jin YJ, Kim SU. Correspondence to editorial on “Risk assessment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma development using vibration-controlled transient elastography: Systematic review and meta-analysis”. Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31:e55–e57.
3. Jin YJ, Kim HY, Suh YJ, Lee CH, Yu JH, Kim MN, et al. Risk assessment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma development using vibration-controlled transient elastography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:S159–S171.
4. Papastergiou V, Lombardi R, MacDonald D, Tsochatzis EA. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Curr Hepatol Rep 2015;14:171–178.
5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, care and treatment for people with chronic hepatitis B infection. Geneva; World Health Organization, 2024.
6. Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, Abbas Z, Chan HL, Chen CJ, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int 2016;10:1–98.
7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2017;67:370–398.
8. Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018;67:1560–1599.
9. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis - 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021;75:659–689.

Article information Continued