Equivalent prevalence and progression of chronic kidney disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Article information

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024;30(4):962-964
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 May 20
doi : https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2024.0264
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
Corresponding author : Tsubasa Tsutsumi Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume 830-0011, Japan Tel: +81-942-31-7561, Fax: +81-942-34-2623, E-mail: tsutsumi_tsubasa@med.kurume-u.ac.jp
Editor: Gi-Ae Kim, Kyung Hee University, Korea
Received 2024 April 15; Revised 2024 May 7; Accepted 2024 May 20.

Dear Editor,

The consensus group, composed of multiple societies, resolved in June 2023 to change the term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) to diminish the potential for stigmatization and more accurately capture its underlying pathophysiology [1]. MASLD should fulfill a new inclusion criterion of “the presence of at least one or more cardiometabolic risk factors,” which emphasizes the significance of chronic inflammatory diseases (e.g., extrahepatic) in the management of steatotic liver disease (SLD) [1,2]. Patients with SLD, associated with cardiometabolic dysregulation, have a higher incidence of extrahepatic diseases, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) [3,4]. Several reports including systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated a significant relationship between NAFLD/MASLD and incident CKD (hazard ratio 1.12–1.43) [5-8]. It is essential to extend research on NAFLD to MASLD to ensure that valuable resources are effectively utilized and contribute to advancing knowledge in this field. Although there have already been some reports on the impact of NAFLD changing to MASLD on cardiovascular risk, the evidence on the development of chronic kidney disease is not sufficient [2]. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the prevalence and progression of CKD risk in patients with NAFLD and MASLD.

The present study included 7,286 consecutive health check examinees who underwent ultrasonography and were monitored at the Saga Health and Clinical Examination Center (Saga, Japan) from January 2010 to March 2020. Of these, 895 were excluded because of insufficient data on alcohol consumption habits (n=541), alcohol consumption ≥60 g/day (n=161), hepatitis C virus infection (n=112), and hepatitis B virus infection (n=81). The final sample of this study comprised 2,306 individuals of Asian origin, all diagnosed with SLD based on ultrasonography [9].

NAFLD was identified in 63.4% (1,462/2,306) of the patients, including those who did not meet the cardiometabolic criteria for MASLD. These cases were classified as cryptogenic SLD, and a substantial portion (93.3%) of the patients with NAFLD were also diagnosed with MASLD. Our results are consistent with previous studies that reported that nearly all NAFLD patients fulfilled the MASLD criteria [10-12]. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or defined if a patient whose renal function was “normal” at the initial visit but developed CKD (whose renal function became persistently abnormal, eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) during follow-up.

There were no significant differences in age, sex, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (median eGFR [range]; 79.8 [36.1–149.8] vs. 79.6 [36.1–149.8]) between the NAFLD and MASLD groups (Supplementary Table 1). The prevalence of CKD in the NAFLD and MASLD groups was 5.34% (78/1,462) and 5.43% (74/1,364), respectively. This data aligns well with a recent study using UK Biobank, which showed a CKD prevalence of 5.42% (410/7,560) in the MASLD group [13]. In the present study, we excluded 12.3% (895/7,286) of individuals, including heavy drinkers and patients with viral hepatitis. These patients may have had an influence on the prevalence of CKD. Therefore, it is important to note that this exclusion may have affected the overall prevalence of CKD in patients with SLD. To compare the development of CKD between the groups, we constructed Kaplan-Meier curves (Fig. 1). The rate of five-year and ten-year cumulative incidence of CKD were 0.054% and 0.262% in patients with NAFLD and 0.057% and 0.261% in patients with MASLD, respectively. There were no significant differences in the development of CKD between patients with NAFLD and MASLD (Fig. 1). These results indicate that the prevalence and progression of CKD are similar in patients with MASLD and those with NAFLD. However, since this study included only Asians, further research should be conducted to investigate whether these findings are applicable to other ethnic or regional groups (e.g., Western populations).

Figure 1.

Differences in CKD development between the NAFLD and MASLD groups. MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease.

In conclusion, data on CKD obtained using the term NAFLD can be extrapolated to MASLD. Furthermore, MASLD has clarified the complications of metabolic dysfunction; therefore,it is expected to develop therapeutic strategies through new monitoring and multifaceted interventions for CKD.

Notes

Authors’ contribution

Hiroyuki Suzuki and Tsubasa Tsutsumi: study concept, design, and drafting; Machiko Kawaguchi: interpretation of data, statistical analysis, and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript; Keisuke Amano: data extraction, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript; Takumi Kawaguchi: study concept, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Takumi Kawaguchi received lecture fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AbbVie GK., and EA Pharma Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under grant number JP23fk0210090.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Supplementary material is available at Clinical and Molecular Hepatology website (http://www.e-cmh.org).

Supplementary Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics between NAFLD and MASLD

cmh-2024-0264-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Abbreviations

NAFLD

non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

MASLD

metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

CKD

chronic kidney disease

SLD

steatotic liver disease

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

References

1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol 2023;79:1542–1556.
2. Kim GA, Moon JH, Kim W. Critical appraisal of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Implication of Janus-faced modernity. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:831–843.
3. Younossi ZM, Paik JM, Stepanova M, Ong J, Alqahtani S, Henry L. Clinical profiles and mortality rates are similar for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2024;80:694–701.
4. Le MH, Le DM, Baez TC, Dang H, Nguyen VH, Lee K, et al. Global incidence of adverse clinical events in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:235–246.
5. Agustanti N, Soetedjo NNM, Damara FA, Iryaningrum MR, Permana H, Bestari MB, et al. The association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2023;17:102780.
6. Mantovani A, Petracca G, Beatrice G, Csermely A, Lonardo A, Schattenberg JM, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of incident chronic kidney disease: an updated meta-analysis. Gut 2022;71:156–162.
7. Chan KE, Ong EYH, Chung CH, Ong CEY, Koh B, Tan DJH, et al. Longitudinal outcomes associated with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A meta-analysis of 129 studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;22:488–498.e14.
8. Gao J, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhan X, Tian X, Li J, et al. Severity and remission of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty/steatotic liver disease with chronic kidney disease occurrence. J Am Heart Assoc 2024;13:e032604.
9. Tsutsumi T, Eslam M, Kawaguchi T, Yamamura S, Kawaguchi A, Nakano D, et al. MAFLD better predicts the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk than NAFLD: Generalized estimating equation approach. Hepatol Res 2021;51:1115–1128.
10. Suzuki H, Shimose S, Iwamoto H, Niizeki T, Kawaguchi T. Changing from NAFLD to MASLD: Similar prognosis of patients with HCC under atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment between NAFLD and MASLD. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:263–265.
11. Suzuki H, Tanaka T, Yamaguchi S, Miwa K, Kawaguchi T. Changing from NAFLD to MASLD: Similar prognosis of unresectable extrahepatic gastrointestinal cancer under chemotherapy between NAFLD and MASLD. J Hepatol 2024;80:e150–e151.
12. Suzuki H, Tsutsumi T, Kawaguchi M, Amano K, Kawaguchi T. Changing from NAFLD to MASLD: Prevalence and progression of ASCVD risk are similar between NAFLD and MASLD in Asia. Clin Mol Hepatol 2024;30:577–579.
13. Fan X, Zhang B, Shi Y, Liu L, Zhao J. Systemic metabolic abnormalities: Key drivers of complications and mortality in MASLD. J Hepatol 2024;80:e246–e248.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Differences in CKD development between the NAFLD and MASLD groups. MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease.