Baveno VII criteria to predict decompensation in compensated advanced chronic liver disease: Still some shades of grey

Article information

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023;29(1):110-112
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 December 12
doi :
Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Corresponding author : Susana G. Rodrigues Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern 3010, Switzerland Tel: +41-31 632 59 00, Fax: +41-31 632 59 99, E-mail:

Editor: Han Ah Lee, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea

Received 2022 November 23; Revised 2022 December 4; Accepted 2022 December 6.

For over six decades, hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) has been the established method to assess accurately portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis [1-3] and the best predictor of decompensation in compensated patients [4]. Given its invasive nature and reduced accessibility in most centers, HVPG is limited in its widespread applicability. The appearance of noninvasive tests (NITs), most notably, transient elastography [5], catapulted these methods from diagnostic and staging tools to prognostic markers for the evaluation of portal hypertension. In the previous Baveno VI, NIT criteria were defined to stratify patients with high-risk varices, sparing endoscopies [6]. The most recent Baveno VII took the role of NITs in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) one step further by defining cut-offs for the presence of CSPH and prognosis, risk stratification and indication for start of beta-blocker therapy [7].

In a recent issue of Clinical and Molecular Hepatology, Wong et al. [8] reported, in a retrospective cohort study, that one-third of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients fulfilled the non-invasive criteria of CSPH defined in the Baveno VII Consensus Workshop [7]. These criteria had yet to be evaluated to predict the risk of decompensation, making this a very timely study. The authors found that, although the noninvasive assessment of CSPH predicts first liver decompensation (variceal bleeding, clinically overt ascites and overt hepatic encephalopathy), and the need for non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) in cACLD patients, for patients in the category “probable CSPH” these criteria were suboptimal to predict decompensation in cACLD patients. Over threefourths of the patients included in this multicentre study had treated hepatitis B or C-associated cACLD. In this study, the Baveno VII criteria to define CSPH (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] ≥25 kPa) and exclude it (LSM <15 kPa and platelet count [PLT] ≥150×109/L) were used [7]. Grey zones were classified into two groups: (high – LSM between 20–25 kPa and PLT <150×109/L, or LSM between 15–20 kPa and PLT <110×109/L, or low – defined as the remaining patients within the grey zone) [7]. Within a median follow-up of 40 months (30–52), among the 1,159 cACLD patients, 7.2% developed a first decompensation (ascites, variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy), 5.8% hepatocellular carcinoma and 4.4% died. Decision curve analysis to assess various screening strategies to stratify patients for NSBB to prevent decompensation showed treating definite CSPH (LSM ≥25 kPa) as a superior strategy was to “treating probable CSPH” and “treating any varices” to initiate NSBB. The number needed to treat was 27 and 50, at treatment thresholds of 5% and 10%, respectively [8].

The Baveno VII consensus cut-offs were based on previous studies, such as the ANTICIPATE study which showed that using NITs, namely LSM combined with PLT showed an excellent discriminative value (AUC, 0.85) in patients with Child-Pugh A compensated cirrhosis [9]. A subsequent study including more patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) demonstrated that a LSM ≥25 kPa is sufficient to rule in CSPH in most aetiologies, including nonobese patients with NASH, but not in obese patients with NASH [10]. The “rule of five” for LSM, at 5–10–15–20–25 kPa, is a tool to stratify the risk of liver-related events, and LSM alone or in combination with PLT, was presented at the recent Baveno VII meeting, and can be used to rule-in and rule-out cACLD and CSPH, as well as to rule-out high-risk varices [7]. During the preparation for the Baveno VII consensus, an individual patient data meta-analysis was performed in patients with cACLD after hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication, with paired HVPG and LSM, and recently published [11]. Regarding the association between NITs and HVPG, a stronger correlation between LSM and HVPG was observed after HCV cure than in patients with active HCV infection, and similar for PLT and HVPG [11]. Furthermore, LSM/PLT ratio for CSPH was comparable or tended to be even better after HCV cure compared to pre-treatment (AUC 0.753 vs. 0.800 for PLT, 0.831 vs. 0.837 for LSM, and 0.871 vs. 0.884 for both) [11]. The authors applied these criteria for LSM and PLT to predict decompensation in a validation cohort of cACLD patients. The 3-year decompensation risk was 0% in patients who met the LSM <12 kPa and PLT >150 g/L criteria. In patients with LSM ≥25 kPa, the 3-year decompensation risk was 9.6%. Among the 40.7% between these cutoffs, only 1.3% developed a decompensation [11].

There are several limitations of the study by Wong et al. [8] Among these, are the variability in patients’ characteristics and clinical practices across the different institutions, the retrospective nature of the study introduces particularly information bias, not accounting for missing information in patients’ records. As the authors mentioned over 75% of the patients included had treated viral cACLD, the applicability of these criteria for patients with other aetiologies remains unclear. In this study, the non-viral aetiology, such as alcohol- or metabolic-related, was identified as one driving factor of liver decompensation, which is unsurprising. The study leaves questions regarding the role “active versus treated disease”, regarding the applicability of the Baveno VII criteria.

The study by Wong et al. [8] has highlighted the need to better stratify the 40–50% of cACLD patients that belong to the “grey zone” of LSM 15–25 kPa for CSPH according to the Baveno VII criteria. In fact, pilot data from a recent retrospective study, using an algorithm combining spleen stiffness measurement (cut-off >/<40 kPa) with the latest rule in and rule out CSPH criteria (LSM ≤15 kPa + PLT ≥150 g/L to rule out CSPH and LSM >25 kPa to rule in CSPH), reduced the grey zone from 40–60% to 7–15%. All first decompensation events occurred in the “rule-in” zone of the model including spleen stiffness measurement [12]. Besides combining with other tools to refine the patients at risk, these criteria require validation in patients with nonviral causes for cACLD, particularly in obese NASH patients, where LSM is not as accurate [10]. Additionally, the role cofactors, such as obesity and diabetes, play in disease progression and LSMs values is a matter of further investigation. Apart from expanding NITs in different aetiologies [13], there is a need for further validate NITs other than transient elastography in cACLD. Another point to explore is the validation of the use of deltas of LSM alone or in combination with other NITs, such as Fibrosis-4 index, and which reduction in stiffness, constitutes an improvement with clinical significance. Recent data has shown that a percentage drop in stiffness, 10% or 20%, can help predict liverrelated events [14,15]. Until date, very few studies have analysed the use of NITs alone or in combination with other markers, to evaluate response to beta-blocker therapy [16,17]. Despite the grey areas that remain, the recent Baveno VII criteria have sent the ball rolling to expand the role of NITs in the clinical management of patients, solidifying their crucial role in patients with cACLD.


Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.



compensated advanced chronic liver disease


clinically significant portal hypertension


hepatitis C virus


hepatic venous pressure gradient


liver stiffness measurement


non-alcoholic steatohepatitis


noninvasive test


non-selective beta-blocker


platelet count


1. Myers JD, Taylor WJ. Occlusive hepatic venous catheterization in the study of the normal liver, cirrhosis of the liver and noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Circulation 1956;13:368–380.
2. Thalheimer U, Leandro G, Samonakis DN, Triantos CK, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Assessment of the agreement between wedge hepatic vein pressure and portal vein pressure in cirrhotic patients. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37:601–608.
3. Viallet A, Joly JG, Marleau D, Lavoie P. Comparison of free portal venous pressure and wedged hepatic venous pressure in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Gastroenterology 1970;59:372–375.
4. Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, Grace N, Burroughs A, Planas R, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007;133:481–488.
5. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1705–1713.
6. de Franchis R, ; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno VI consensus workshop: stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015;63:743–752.
7. de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, ; Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022;76:959–974.
8. Wong YJ, Zhaojin C, Tosetti G, Degasperi E, Sharma S, Agarwal S, et al. Baveno-VII criteria to predict decompensation and initiate non-selective beta-blocker in compensated advanced chronic liver disease patients. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023;29:135–145.
9. Abraldes JG, Bureau C, Stefanescu H, Augustin S, Ney M, Blasco H, et al. Noninvasive tools and risk of clinically significant portal hypertension and varices in compensated cirrhosis: the “ANTICIPATE” study. Hepatology 2016;64:2173–2184.
10. Pons M, Augustin S, Scheiner B, Guillaume M, Rosselli M, Rodrigues SG, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;116:723–732.
11. Semmler G, Lens S, Meyer EL, Baiges A, Alvardo-Tapias E, Llop E, et al. Non-invasive tests for clinically significant portal hypertension after HCV cure. J Hepatol 2022;77:1573–1585.
12. Dajti E, Ravaioli F, Marasco G, Alemanni LV, Colecchia L, Ferrarese A, et al. A combined Baveno VII and spleen stiffness algorithm to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117:1825–1833.
13. Kim BK. The cutoff of transient elastography for the evaluation of portal hypertension should be different according to the etiology? Clin Mol Hepatol 2021;27:91–93.
14. Pons M, Simón-Talero M, Millán L, Ventura-Cots M, Santos B, Augustin S, et al. Basal values and changes of liver stiffness predict the risk of disease progression in compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Dig Liver Dis 2016;48:1214–1219.
15. Hagström H, Talbäck M, Andreasson A, Walldius G, Hammar N. Repeated FIB-4 measurements can help identify individuals at risk of severe liver disease. J Hepatol 2020;73:1023–1029.
16. Kim HY, So YH, Kim W, Ahn DW, Jung YJ, Woo H, et al. Noninvasive response prediction in prophylactic carvedilol therapy for cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. J Hepatol 2019;70:412–422.
17. Marasco G, Dajti E, Ravaioli F, Alemanni LV, Capuano F, Gjini K, et al. Spleen stiffness measurement for assessing the response to β-blockers therapy for high-risk esophageal varices patients. Hepatol Int 2020;14:850–857.

Article information Continued